Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Ogden v. Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. et al
Case Number:
2:18-cv-12792
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 15, 2019
Where Franchise No-Poach Agreements Stand Today
Washington state's attorney general is forging ahead with a campaign against no-poach provisions in franchise agreements, cutting deals last week with four more chains to eliminate the practice, but with few courts weighing in so far, it is unclear which legal standard for judging the provisions will prevail.
-
July 30, 2019
Little Caesars Ducks Ex-Manager's No-Poach Suit
A Michigan federal judge has tossed a former Little Caesars manager's suit alleging that the pizza chain's franchise agreements violate antitrust law, after refusing to apply a strict legal standard to provisions preventing the chain's franchisees from hiring each other's workers.