Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Balderas v. Tiny Lab Productions et al
Case Number:
1:18-cv-00854
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Carney Bates
- Fenwick & West
- Lieff Cabraser
- Mayer Brown
- Miller Stratvert
- Modrall Sperling
- Perkins Coie
- Venable LLP
- Wiggins Williams & Wiggins
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 03, 2021
Google Can't Shake NM AG's Children Online Privacy Claims
A New Mexico federal judge rejected Google's bid to dismiss children's privacy law and intrusion on privacy claims against it initiated by the state's attorney general over surreptitiously collecting children's location and personal data via app games.
-
March 24, 2020
Twitter Can't Nix NM Kids' Data Suit Based On Jurisdiction
A New Mexico federal judge on Tuesday denied a dismissal bid by Twitter and a collection of advertising services used in Tiny Lab apps, ruling the court has jurisdiction to handle the state's claims that the companies surreptitiously collected kids' location data and personal information.
-
January 14, 2019
Twitter, Google Look To Toss NM's Suit Over Kids' Data
Twitter, Google and advertising services used in Tiny Lab's apps moved Friday to shake the New Mexico attorney general's claims that they surreptitiously collected kids' location data and personal information, arguing they had no actual knowledge the apps were directed toward children and have no concrete ties to the state.