Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
United States of America et al v. Fluor Corporation Inc et al
Case Number:
6:13-cv-02428
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Other Statutes: False Claims Act
Judge:
Firms
- Arnold & Porter
- Bluestein Nichols
- Bluestein Thompson
- Cassidy Coates Price PA
- Chris Kenney Law
- Covington & Burling
- Eppes & Plumblee
- Gallivan White
- Loevy & Loevy
- Maynard Nexsen
- Robinson Bradshaw
- Saluda Law
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 18, 2026
Fluor Must Disclose Amounts Paid To Trial Witnesses
A South Carolina federal judge ordered Fluor Corp. on Tuesday to disclose how much it has paid fact witnesses amid a trial over claims Fluor overcharged the military, but declined to invalidate the company's compensation agreements with the witnesses.
-
February 10, 2026
Fluor Says Deals To Compensate Trial Witnesses Pass Muster
Fluor Corp. pushed back on Tuesday at former military officers' claims in an ongoing trial in South Carolina federal court that the company's compensation agreements with its witnesses jeopardize the whistleblowers' ability to get a fair trial over allegations Fluor overcharged the military, arguing the deals are permissible.
-
February 09, 2026
Whistleblowers Accuse Fluor Of Hiding Payment To Witnesses
Former military officers turned whistleblowers accused Fluor Corp. on Monday of secretly paying at least three witnesses during a trial over claims that the company overcharged the military, using contracts that prevent them from disclosing facts that Fluor doesn't want them to.
-
January 26, 2026
Judge Won't Block Bombing Evidence From Fluor Fraud Trial
A South Carolina federal judge declined for now Fluor Corp.'s request to block all evidence and testimony related to a suicide bombing at Bagram Airfield in Afghanistan and employee retaliation from an upcoming trial over accusations that the company overcharged the military.
-
January 20, 2026
Whistleblowers Fight Fluor's Bid To Limit Evidence In Trial
Whistleblowers who accuse Fluor Corp. of overcharging the U.S. military asked a South Carolina federal judge to deny the company's push to keep evidence related to fraud and retaliation allegations and an Afghan suicide bombing out of an upcoming trial.
-
January 14, 2026
Military Fraud Case Against Fluor Moves To Trial
Litigation brought by former military officers accusing Fluor Corp. of overcharging the U.S. Army is headed to trial, after a South Carolina federal judge couldn't rule out Wednesday whether the company willfully failed to comply with its contractual obligations.
-
January 12, 2026
Army Contractor Seeks To Limit Evidence In Fraud Trial
Fluor Corp. told a South Carolina federal judge that evidence and testimony related to a suicide bombing at Bagram Airfield and to fraud allegations must be excluded from a trial over accusations that the company overcharged the military.
-
October 21, 2025
Whistleblowers Say They've Shown Fluor Defrauded Army
Former Fluor Corp. employees asked a South Carolina federal judge Tuesday to rule in favor of their theories that the company fraudulently secured bonus awards and property management system approvals for a massive contract to support U.S. military bases in Afghanistan.
-
December 19, 2024
Top Gov't Contracts Cases Of 2024
Courts and the U.S. Government Accountability Office have made several high-profile, consequential decisions for government contractors this year, addressing the constitutionality of the False Claims Act's whistleblower provisions and the limits of the president's authority over federal procurement.
-
November 04, 2024
Relators Want Denial Of Fluor FCA Legality Argument To Stick
Four relators have urged a South Carolina federal judge not to reconsider his effective denial of Fluor Corp.'s bid to toss their allegedly unconstitutional False Claims Act suit accusing the company of overcharging the military, saying there was no legal error.