Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
USA v. Scott
Case Number:
1:17-cr-00630
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
-
June 06, 2019
Feds Defend Raids On Ex-Locke Atty In Crypto Scam Case
Federal prosecutors defended their seizure of evidence from properties belonging to former Locke Lord LLP attorney Mark S. Scott, arguing in New York federal court Wednesday that the warrants were based on ample probable cause and that the trial team never saw material protected by attorney-client privilege.
-
May 15, 2019
Ex-Locke Atty Tries To Quash Evidence In Crypto Scam Case
Former Locke Lord LLP attorney Mark S. Scott has urged a New York federal court to exclude evidence seized from his properties in the government's case over his alleged role in laundering proceeds of a $400 million cryptocurrency scam, claiming the search warrants and affidavits were unconstitutional.
-
November 15, 2018
Feds Doubt Ex-BigLaw Atty's Privilege Applies In Crypto Scam
Manhattan federal prosecutors gave a preview of the evidence they'd gathered against former Locke Lord LLP lawyer Mark S. Scott on Thursday over his alleged role in laundering proceeds of a $400 million cryptocurrency scam, saying most of his work was financial, not legal, and the crime-fraud exception may apply to his privilege claims.