Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Rice v. National Beverage Corporation d/b/a LaCroix Sparkling Waters
Case Number:
1:18-cv-07151
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 18, 2020
LaCroix Drinkers Retract Claims Over 'Natural' Label
Illinois consumers on Tuesday agreed to drop a proposed class action and later retracted their claims that the maker of the wildly popular LaCroix sparkling water wrongly advertised its drinks are "100% Natural" despite adding synthetic compounds used in insecticides and cancer treatments.
-
July 12, 2019
LaCroix's 'Outraged' Sanctions Bid In 'Natural' Suit Falls Flat
An "outraged" yet "repetitive" sanctions bid by LaCroix accusing a proposed class of consumers of its sparkling water of "financial terrorism" over their false labeling suit fails to back up its arguments with evidence, an Illinois federal judge has said.
-
March 19, 2019
LaCroix Additives Need Not Be Fuel To Be False, Drinkers Say
Consumers of LaCroix Sparkling Water urged an Illinois federal judge to deny an "unprofessional" bid for sanctions in their suit over an allegedly misleading "100% Natural" label, saying the company's contention is faulty that food additives are synthetic only if they are derived from fossil fuels.