Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
In Re Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products Liability Litigation MDL 2873
Case Number:
2:18-mn-02873
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Husch Blackwell
- Seeger Weiss
- Hinshaw & Culbertson
- Dvorak & Associates
- Resnick & Louis
- Simpson & Deardorff
- Cozen O'Connor
- Maynard Nexsen
- Kennedys Law LLP
- Gallivan White
- Kilpatrick Townsend
- Todd & Weld
- Saul Ewing
- Parker Poe
- Kirkland & Ellis
- K&L Gates
- Sinars Slowikowski
- Knauf Shaw
- Levin Papantonio
- King & Spalding
- Sive Paget
- Connell Foley
- Dentons
- Barnwell Whaley
- Orrick Herrington
- Robinson Bradshaw
- Graves & King
- Ropers Majeski
- Bryan Cave
- Edelson PC
- Goldberg Segalla
- Dechert LLP
- Marten Law LLP
- Burr & Forman
- Baron & Budd
- Crueger Dickinson
- Bartkiewicz Kronick
- Williams & Connolly
- Douglas & London
- Goldman Ismail
- Sonosky Chambers
- AltmanNewman
- Wilkinson Stekloff
- Howser Newman
- Lieff Cabraser
- Bartlit Beck
- Motley Rice
- Freeman Mathis
- Baker & Hostetler
- Taft Stettinius
- Wyche PA
- Luff Law Firm
- Barnes & Thornburg
- Keller Rohrback
- Troutman Pepper
- Hellman Yates
- Thomas Combs
- Adams & Reese
- White and Williams
- Campbell Conroy
- Morgan Lewis
- Napoli Shkolnik
- Richardson Thomas
- Arnold & Porter
- Rigano LLC
- Duffy & Young
- Sidley Austin
- Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani
- Kazmarek Mowrey
- Singleton Schreiber
- Plunkett Cooney
- Smith Anderson
- Allen Glaessner
- DLA Piper
- Hogan Lovells
- Nelson Mullins
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Sullivan & Triggs
- Norris McLaughlin
- Jones & Keller
- Greenberg Traurig
- Shook Hardy
- Harris Beach PLLC
- Crowell & Moring
- Kelley Drye
- Burke Williams & Sorensen
- Jones Day
- Day Pitney
- Kanner & Whiteley
- Williams Mullen
- Clement Rivers
- Grant & Eisenhofer
- Gunster Yoakley
- Mayer Brown
Companies
- Veolia Environnement SA
- Clariant AG
- Bayer AG
- DuPont de Nemours Inc.
- BASF SE
- RTX Corp.
- Honeywell International Inc.
- Mine Safety Appliances Company
- Association of California Water Agencies
- 3M Co.
- Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
- Lower Colorado River Authority
- North Texas Municipal Water District
- Milliken & Company Inc.
- NSK Americas Inc.
- Corteva Inc.
- Ascend Performance Materials LLC
- The Chemours Co.
- Phillips 66
- Safety-Kleen, Inc.
- Lakehaven Water & Sewer District
- Johnson Controls International PLC
- Archroma
- W. L. Gore & Associates Inc.
Government Agencies
- California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
- Mescalero Apache Tribe
- State of Tennessee
- State of Maryland
- Ak-Chin Indian Community
- Port Authority of New York & New Jersey
- St. Regis Mohawk Tribe
- Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 17, 2024
New Mexico Adds Superfund Claims To PFAS Suit Against US
New Mexico is expanding its lawsuit against the federal government over costs related to cleaning up forever chemicals near military sites by utilizing a new rule listing the substances as hazardous under the Superfund law.
-
June 11, 2024
Tyco's $750M PFAS Deal In Foam Co. MDL Gets Initial OK
A South Carolina federal judge gave his blessing Tuesday to the $750 million settlement Johnson Controls International PLC subsidiary Tyco Fire Products LP entered to resolve public water systems' federal claims that some forever chemicals they detected in their supplies came from firefighting foam it made.
-
May 21, 2024
BASF Agrees To $316.5M Settlement In PFAS Foam MDL
Attorneys representing public water systems in a South Carolina multidistrict litigation over so-called forever chemicals in drinking water announced Tuesday that they've reached an agreement in principle with defendant BASF Corp., which will pay $316.5 million to resolve the claims.
-
May 07, 2024
AIG Insurers Near Deal With Foam Co. Over MDL Coverage
Firefighting foam company Tyco Fire Products LP and a group of AIG insurers have reached a tentative settlement that would resolve a dispute over coverage of multidistrict litigation involving Tyco over so-called forever chemicals, according to a notice filed Tuesday in South Carolina federal court.
-
April 12, 2024
Tyco Reaches $750M PFAS Deal In Foam Co. MDL
Johnson Controls International PLC subsidiary Tyco Fire Products LP on Friday agreed to pay $750 million to settle public water systems' federal claims that some "forever chemicals" they detected in their supplies came from firefighting foam it made.
-
April 01, 2024
3M Gets Final OK On PFAS Deal Worth Up To $12.5B
A South Carolina federal judge on Friday gave a final nod on a settlement between 3M and about 12,000 public water systems worth up to $12.5 billion to end claims over so-called forever chemicals in firefighting foam, saying that otherwise it would take years to try the cases.
-
March 18, 2024
Plaintiffs Call For Sanctions Over PFAS MDL Deal Threat
A proposed class in multidistrict litigation against DuPont and others alleging they contaminated drinking water with PFAS chemicals is urging a South Carolina federal court to sanction attorneys for a California water service, saying they violated court rules in their latest objections to a settlement.
-
February 27, 2024
Defense Dept. Looks To Shake Firefighting Foam MDL Claims
The U.S. Department of Defense on Monday asked a South Carolina federal judge to free it from claims in sprawling multidistrict litigation that its use of forever chemical-containing firefighting foam contaminated drinking water near its facilities.
-
February 08, 2024
$1B DuPont Deal Gets Final OK In Firefighting Foam MDL
A South Carolina federal judge on Thursday granted final approval to a $1.18 billion settlement involving chemical companies DuPont, Chemours and Corteva over drinking water polluted by so-called forever chemicals, dismissing objections raised by three Washington cities and the North Texas Municipal Water District, among others.
-
February 01, 2024
Conn. PFAS Water Pollution Suit Escapes Multidistrict Bid
The federal multidistrict litigation panel has denied a Connecticut utility's attempt to funnel a lawsuit arising from PFAS "forever chemicals" into a broader nationwide case, concluding that the claims against Connecticut Water Co. are too different to be lumped into the MDL.