Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Ernesto Torres et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
Case Number:
5:18-cv-02604
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 13, 2020
ICE Must Allow Detainees Private Atty Calls Amid COVID-19
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement must provide detainees with free, private phone service so they can contact their attorneys, which is of crucial importance during the coronavirus pandemic, when the detainees' lives are at risk, a California federal judge has ruled.
-
April 02, 2020
ICE Facility's COVID-19 Atty Visit Rules Unclear, Judge Says
A putative class of federal immigration detainees suing the government over prison-like conditions and attorney access complained to a California federal judge at a hearing Thursday that COVID-19 protocols are further restricting access to attorneys — policies the judge called unclear.
-
October 25, 2019
DHS, Private Prison Contractor Can't Shake Off Detainees' Suit
The U.S. government and a private prison contractor must face a proposed class action accusing them of detaining immigrants in prisonlike conditions while limiting access to lawyers after a California federal judge determined that the suit does not seek a review of removal orders.