Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Corporacion AIC, S.A. v. Hidroelectrica Santa Rita S.A.
Case Number:
1:19-cv-20294
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
-
August 04, 2020
Guatemalan Construction Corp. Can't Nix $7.5M Award
A Florida federal judge has tossed a Guatemalan construction company's motion to vacate a $7.5 million arbitration award stemming from a botched hydroelectric plant, citing "unambiguous" Eleventh Circuit precedent.
-
April 30, 2020
Guatemala Construction Co. Says $7.5M Award Can't Be OK'd
A Guatemalan construction company is arguing a Florida federal magistrate judge erred in recommending the enforcement of a $7.5 million arbitration award because she wrongly concluded the court lacks authority to vacate the award under U.S. arbitration law.
-
April 17, 2020
Guatemalan Builder Can't Escape $7.5M Power Award
A Florida magistrate judge has recommended that a U.S. district court deny a Guatemalan construction company's bid to nix a $7.5 million arbitration award in a dispute over a hydroelectric plant, saying federal arbitration law was correctly applied in the award's enforcement.
-
January 24, 2019
Guatemalan Builder Seeks Nix Of $7M Award In Power Row
A Guatemalan construction company has asked a Florida federal court to cancel a more than $7 million arbitration award in a dispute over the construction of a hydroelectric plant in the country, arguing that the arbitrators who greenlighted the sum went beyond their powers.