Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
ESW Holdings, Inc. v. Roku, Inc.
Case Number:
6:19-cv-00044
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 25, 2021
Albright Won't Grant New Patent Trial Against Roku
U.S. District Judge Alan Albright of the Western District of Texas has refused to hold a new trial after a jury cleared Roku Inc. of infringing interactive TV patents, saying that the patent owner did not voice its concerns during trial and could not now "cry that it has been wronged."
-
May 26, 2021
Roku Urges Albright To Reject New Trial Bid After Patent Win
Roku Inc. is urging Western District of Texas Judge Alan D. Albright not to grant a new trial in a case where a jury cleared Roku of infringing interactive TV patents, saying that the patent owner "forwent every opportunity at trial" to object to testimony it had called "egregiously improper."
-
May 12, 2021
Albright Told 'Egregiously Improper' Testimony Merits Retrial
A company that failed to persuade a Western District of Texas jury that Roku Inc. infringed its interactive TV patents is asking for a new trial, saying that Roku presented "egregiously improper" testimony that purportedly "shocked" U.S. District Judge Alan D. Albright.
-
April 30, 2021
How Jackson Walker Beat $228M IP Claim Against Roku
A Jackson Walker LLP team walked into the federal courthouse in Waco, Texas, prepared to defend Roku Inc. against a $9.5 million claim that it infringed two patents for interactive television technology, yet they got a surprise when that estimate ballooned to $228 million during trial.
-
April 09, 2021
Roku Cleared Of Infringement In $228M Interactive TV IP Trial
A Western District of Texas jury decided on Friday that Roku Inc. had not infringed two interactive television technology patents held by software development company ESW Holdings Inc. and awarded no damages.
-
April 05, 2021
Texas Jury Told Roku Infringed Interactive TV Patents
A Western District of Texas jury heard Monday in opening arguments that Roku Inc. has infringed two interactive television technology patents and must pay a software developer for the years it has used the protected tech to boost its own bottom line.