Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Doe v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Case Number:
3:19-cv-03310
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
September 15, 2022
Uber Defeats Negligence Claim Over Impostor Driver's Assault
A California federal judge nixed a negligence claim Thursday asserted by an Uber passenger who was assaulted after getting into the car of a suspended driver, which still bore the Uber decal, finding that the ride-hailing giant didn't owe a duty of care for the harm caused by a third party.
-
May 01, 2020
Uber Ducks All But Negligence Claim Over Rape By Ex-Driver
A California federal magistrate judge again tossed claims that Uber was responsible for the alleged assault of a passenger who accepted a ride from a suspended driver whose car still bore the Uber decal, but allowed her negligence claim to survive.
-
November 22, 2019
Uber Dodges Suit Over Sex Assault By Fake Driver, For Now
A California federal magistrate judge on Friday threw out a lawsuit from a woman who was sexually assaulted by a suspended Uber driver, but gave the woman another chance to demonstrate a clearer link between the driver's employment and the attack she survived.
-
September 04, 2019
Uber Says It's Not Liable For Fake Driver's Assault On Rider
Uber told a California federal court Wednesday that it cannot be held liable for a passenger's 2018 sexual assault by a driver who had been suspended but pretended to still be an Uber driver to prowl for female riders.