Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Applied Predictive Technologies, Inc. v. MarketDial, Inc. et al
Case Number:
2:19-cv-00496
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- ArentFox Schiff
- ArentFox Schiff LLP
- Bryan Cave
- Dentons
- Foley & Lardner
- Goodwin Procter
- Knobbe Martens
- O'Hagan Meyer
- Ray Quinney
- Spencer Fane
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 28, 2025
Failed Software Secrets Case Costs MasterCard Unit $2.8M
A federal judge in Utah has ordered a MasterCard unit to cough up over $2.8 million in legal fees for "aggressively" litigating an "objectively specious" trade secrets suit against two McKinsey consultants who went on to found one of MasterCard's only serious rivals in a corner of the business analytics software market.
-
April 11, 2022
Judge Trims MasterCard Unit's IP Suit Over Analytics Software
A Utah federal judge has agreed to shave down a trade secrets and patent infringement suit against an analytics company over a MasterCard subsidiary's business analyzing software, tossing fraud and contract breach claims after determining two employment agreements didn't definitively protect the proprietary technology.
-
March 25, 2022
Utah Tech Co. Wants Sanctions For LinkedIn Hush Request
The Utah software firm MarketDial Inc. has accused a Dentons partner of wrongly trying to keep past employees of a tech company from sharing evidence in a lengthy intellectual-property spat between the two businesses.