Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Department of Homeland Security, et al., Petitioners v. Vijayakumar Thuraissigiam
Case Number:
19-161
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Firms
- Gibson Dunn
- Jenner & Block
- Jones Day
- Law Office of Lawrence J. Joseph
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Robbins Russell
- Simon Peragine
- WilmerHale
Companies
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
December 21, 2020
Top Immigration Cases Of 2020: Year In Review
The federal courts considered a mountain of immigration litigation this past year, from the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark ruling on protections for young unauthorized immigrants to a flurry of cases challenging immigration detention and visa restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic.
-
June 25, 2020
High Court Won't Expand Court Review For Asylum-Seekers
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday that federal courts can't review migrants' challenges to early denials in the asylum process, tightly limiting court review for foreigners in fast-tracked deportation proceedings.
-
March 02, 2020
Justices Seem Wary Of Expanding Court Review For Migrants
The U.S. Supreme Court appeared reluctant to give migrants stuck in fast-tracked deportation proceedings access to the federal courts, as the justices questioned the limits of court review for asylum-seekers at oral arguments on Monday.
-
January 23, 2020
States, ABA Urge High Court To Affirm Migrant Habeas Review
A coalition of 20 attorneys general and the American Bar Association told the U.S. Supreme Court Wednesday that expedited removal of migrants fails to sufficiently safeguard against erroneous deportations, weighing in on a fight over court authority to review whether asylum-seekers credibly fear persecution.
-
January 16, 2020
ACLU Fights For Habeas Review For Migrants At High Court
The American Civil Liberties Union argued that migrants have the constitutional right to challenge early denials in the asylum process at the federal district courts, urging the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday to strike down a statute that limits review.
-
December 16, 2019
States Urge High Court To Limit Immigrants' Habeas Review
A coalition of nearly a dozen states urged the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday to preserve tight limits on federal courts' ability to review appeals brought by migrants in fast-tracked removal proceedings.
-
December 11, 2019
DHS Tells Justices Bar On Court Review Of Removal Is Lawful
The federal government has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to overrule a Ninth Circuit decision determining that a Sri Lankan citizen can challenge his expedited removal, saying that district courts don't have the authority to review immigrant admission applications.
-
November 05, 2019
High Court Habeas Case Could Slow Fast-Tracked Removal
The U.S. Supreme Court's decision to consider when courts can review early determinations from asylum officers could open another door for migrants to fight deportation and undermine the fast-tracked removal system that the Trump administration has tried to expand.
-
October 18, 2019
High Court Agrees To Take Up Asylum Review Case
The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Friday to hear an appeal by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security in a case concerning whether district courts have the power to review whether asylum-seekers have established a credible fear of persecution.