Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
IN RE: ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PRIVACY LITIGATION
Case Number:
5:20-cv-02155
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Ahdoot & Wolfson
- Bottini & Bottini
- Cooley LLP
- Cotchett Pitre
- Covington & Burling
- Davis Wright Tremaine
- Gibbs Law Group
- Gustafson Gluek
- Gutride Safier
- Hartley LLP
- Law Offices of John L. Fallat
- Loevy & Loevy
- Lowey Dannenberg
- Morgan & Morgan
- Reinhardt Wendorf
- Schubert Jonckheer
- Stueve Siegel
- Tycko & Zavareei
- Wexler Boley
- Wolf Haldenstein
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 22, 2021
Zoom Users' $85M Deal Ending 'Zoombombing' Suits Gets OK
A California federal judge Thursday gave the initial thumbs-up to Zoom users' $85 million deal resolving privacy and data security claims against the videoconferencing provider, months after the court questioned the claims over data sharing and "Zoombombing" disruptions.
-
August 02, 2021
Zoom Inks $85M Deal To End Users' 'Zoombombing' Suits
Zoom users asked a California federal judge over the weekend to greenlight their $85 million deal resolving privacy and data security claims against the videoconferencing provider months after the court questioned the claims over data sharing and "Zoombombing" disruptions.
-
March 12, 2021
Zoom Largely Shakes Data Sharing, 'Zoombombing' Claims
Northern District of California Judge Lucy H. Koh partially freed Zoom from a consolidated putative class action alleging a range of privacy and data security missteps, ruling that the plaintiffs had failed to show that Zoom had illegally shared their personal data and that the company was largely immune from claims over "Zoombombing" disruptions.
-
December 03, 2020
Zoom Says 'Zoombombing' Privacy Suits Don't Allege Harm
Putative class actions claiming that Zoom shared unauthorized data, failed to prevent meeting disruptions by third-parties called "Zoombombings," and misrepresented its encryption protocols should be tossed because they don't allege harm, the video-conferencing platform said Wednesday.
-
April 27, 2020
8 Zoom Privacy Suits Tied Together In Calif.
A California federal judge on Friday combined eight proposed class actions against Zoom alleging the video-conferencing platform failed to protect users' personal information, an order that comes as the company carries out a 90-day plan aimed at boosting security.
-
April 03, 2020
Zoom's Sudden Rise Presents Test For New Calif. Privacy Law
The privacy backlash that has accompanied Zoom's meteoric rise since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic has sparked challenges that are poised to test the strength of California's new privacy law and fuel calls for other states to embrace robust data safeguards.
-
March 31, 2020
Zoom Hit With Proposed Class Action Over Privacy Concerns
Zoom Video Communications Inc., the video conference service and de facto platform for digital communication during the COVID-19 pandemic, has been hit with a proposed class action claiming the platform has failed to protect users' personal information.