Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Shadi Hayden v. The Retail Equation, Inc. et al
Case Number:
8:20-cv-01203
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Abington Cole
- Ahdoot & Wolfson
- Alston & Bird
- ArentFox Schiff
- ArentFox Schiff LLP
- Bryan Cave
- Caldwell LLP
- Hunton Andrews
- King & Spalding
- Morgan Lewis
- Morrison Foerster
- Robins Kaplan
- Sheppard Mullin
- Troutman
Companies
- Advance Auto Parts Inc.
- Appriss Inc.
- Bath & Body Works Direct Inc.
- Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.
- Best Buy Co. Inc.
- Caleres Inc.
- CVS Health Corp.
- Dick's Sporting Goods Inc.
- L Brands Inc.
- Sephora SA
- Stein Mart, Inc.
- The Gap Inc.
- The TJX Cos. Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 05, 2022
Data-Sharing Claims Against Big Retailers Largely Shelved
A California federal judge has permanently tossed most of a proposed class action accusing retail giants such as Sephora, CVS and Home Depot of illegally sharing their consumer transaction data, leaving only an invasion of privacy claim to go forward.
-
November 04, 2021
Shoppers Say Sephora's Data-Sharing Violations Are Ongoing
Two shoppers suing cosmetics giant Sephora say that it doesn't matter when California consumer privacy laws went into effect, since their proposed class action complaint accuses the company of illegally sharing their consumer transaction data on a continuing basis.
-
October 05, 2021
Retail Heavyweights Push To Escape Data-Sharing Suit
Major retailers including Sephora, Bed Bath & Beyond and Bath & Body Works pushed Monday to dismiss customers' claims that they illegally shared customer transaction data, saying the alleged violations took place before California's consumer privacy requirements took effect.
-
July 12, 2021
Gap Can't Force Arbitration In Credit Card Info Sharing Spat
The Gap Inc. can't compel arbitration in a proposed class action claiming it breached California's Consumer Privacy Act by sharing the data of Gap credit card users with a third-party software firm, with a federal judge finding the bank issuing the cards is the party that could enforce arbitration.
-
July 08, 2021
Software Co. Beats Privacy Claims On Consumer 'Risk Scores'
A California federal judge has tossed proposed class action claims against a software firm alleging it improperly shares customer data when working with major retailers, including The Gap and TJ Maxx, to create "risk scores" identifying potentially fraudulent consumer returns, ruling the complaint is "too vague" about what data is collected.
-
January 25, 2021
TJ Maxx Shoppers Claim Arbitration Terms Were Buried
T.J. Maxx shoppers have shot back at the retailer's bid to toss claims that it breached California's Consumer Privacy Act by sharing their data with a third-party software firm, arguing that the company buried arbitration terms in hard-to-find fine print on its website.