Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
Case Number:
4:20-cv-05640
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- A&O Shearman
- Arnold & Porter
- Bartko LLP
- Cahill Gordon
- Cravath Swaine
- Davis Wright Tremaine
- Faegre Drinker
- Fenwick & West
- Fox Rothschild
- Gibson Dunn
- Hagens Berman
- Holtzman Vogel
- Hueston Hennigan
- Huth Reynolds
- Kressin Meador
- Kwun Bhansali
- Massumi & Consoli
- McDermott Will & Emery
- Mitchell Silberberg
- Munger Tolles
- Norton Rose
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Orrick Herrington
- Paul Weiss
- Perkins Coie
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- Quinn Emanuel
- Reichman Jorgensen Lehman & Feldberg LLP
- Skadden Arps
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Turner Boyd
- Walker Stevens
- Weil Gotshal
- Wiggin & Dana
- Willkie Farr
- Wilson Sonsini
- Wolf Haldenstein
Companies
- Amazon.com Inc.
- Apple Inc.
- Digital Content Next
- Epic Games Inc.
- Google LLC
- Match Group LLC
- Meta Platforms Inc.
- Microsoft Corp.
- Netflix Inc.
- Nintendo Co. Ltd.
- NVIDIA Corp.
- Paypal Holdings Inc.
- Roblox Corp.
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc.
- Spotify Technology SA
- Valve Corp.
- Visa Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 22, 2024
Antitrust Judge Questions Apple's Phil Schiller On New Fees
A California federal judge deciding whether Apple has complied with her ban on App Store anti-steering rules questioned Apple fellow Phil Schiller on Wednesday on Apple's new program imposing 27% fees on out-of-app transactions, saying "all the new program does is maintain the anti-competitive environment" for the company's benefit.
-
May 17, 2024
Apple OK'd New App Fees Despite Antitrust Ruling
An Apple Inc. executive conceded during a high-stakes antitrust hearing Friday over Apple's compliance with a court-ordered ban on App Store anti-steering rules that executives decided to implement a new 27% fee on out-of-app transactions despite knowing a jury had recently found that similar Google fees violated antitrust laws.
-
May 16, 2024
Apple Exec Must Produce All Docs On 27% App Fee Decision
A California federal judge presiding over a high-stakes antitrust hearing over Apple's compliance with a court-ordered ban on App Store anti-steering rules ordered a company executive Thursday to hand over all of his communications and notes on Apple's decision to impose a new 27% fee after her injunction.
-
May 10, 2024
Epic Judge Raises Eyebrows About Apple's New 27% App Fee
The California federal judge overseeing Epic's antitrust case against Apple challenged the terms the tech giant is using to comply with her order to allow app developers to send users to outside payment platforms, saying Friday that Apple appears to be trying to maintain its past revenue with a new 27% fee.
-
May 08, 2024
Apple Judge Skeptical Tech Giant Complying With Epic Order
The California federal judge overseeing Epic's antitrust suit against Apple reacted skeptically Wednesday to an Apple executive's claim that it has fully complied with her order aimed at allowing app developers to send users to outside payment platforms, saying some of Apple's new rules appear to "stifle competition."
-
April 15, 2024
Apple Defends Anti-Steering Rule Compliance In Epic Case
Apple told a California federal court it has fully complied with an order barring anti-steering rules in its App Store and said complaints from Epic Games, Microsoft and others about its compliance are just efforts by the companies to pad their own profits.
-
April 05, 2024
Microsoft, Others Can Weigh In On Epic, Apple App Store Row
A California federal judge allowed Microsoft, X Corp., Meta Platforms, Spotify and other major app developers to file amicus briefs in Epic Games' effort to convince the court that Apple is not complying with an order barring it from using anti-steering rules in its App Store.
-
April 03, 2024
Apple Blasts Input From Microsoft, Meta, Others In Epic Case
Apple asked a California federal judge Wednesday to reject attempts by Microsoft, Meta Platforms, Spotify and other major developers to insert themselves into Epic Games' argument that the iPhone maker is not complying with an order barring it from using anti-steering rules in the App Store.
-
March 21, 2024
Microsoft, Meta, Others Say Apple Violating Court Order
Major developers including Microsoft, Meta Platforms and Spotify have told a California federal court that Apple is not complying with an order secured by Epic Games barring Apple's use of anti-steering rules in the App Store.
-
March 13, 2024
Epic Says Apple Is 'Blatantly' Violating App Store Order
Epic Games told a California federal court on Wednesday that Apple is "blatantly" violating an order issued under state law barring anti-steering rules in the App Store by imposing new fees and restrictions that make linking to outside payment methods effectively impossible.