Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
Case Number:
4:20-cv-05640
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- A&O Shearman
- Arnold & Porter
- Bartko LLP
- Cahill Gordon
- Cravath Swaine
- Davis Wright Tremaine
- Faegre Drinker
- Fenwick & West
- Fox Rothschild
- Gibson Dunn
- Hagens Berman
- Hausfeld LLP
- Holtzman Vogel
- Hueston Hennigan
- Huth Reynolds
- King & Spalding
- Kressin Meador
- Kwun Bhansali
- London & Naor
- Massumi & Consoli
- McDermott Will & Emery
- Mitchell Silberberg
- Morgan Lewis
- Munger Tolles
- Norton Rose
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Orrick Herrington
- Paul Weiss
- Perkins Coie
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- Quinn Emanuel
- Reichman Jorgensen Lehman & Feldberg LLP
- Skadden Arps
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Turner Boyd
- Walker Stevens
- Weil Gotshal
- Wiggin & Dana
- Willkie Farr
- Wilson Sonsini
- Wolf Haldenstein
Companies
- Amazon.com Inc.
- Apple Inc.
- Digital Content Next
- Epic Games Inc.
- Google LLC
- Match Group LLC
- Meta Platforms Inc.
- Microsoft Corp.
- Netflix Inc.
- Nintendo Co. Ltd.
- NVIDIA Corp.
- Paypal Holdings Inc.
- Roblox Corp.
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc.
- Spotify Technology SA
- Valve Corp.
- Visa Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
-
December 17, 2024
Apple Fights Epic's Atty Privilege Challenge Win Over Docs
Apple has asked a California federal judge to overturn a magistrate judge and allow it to withhold documents in a discovery spat with Epic Games, arguing Monday the documents in the antitrust case aren't simply business analyses but rather, reflect "'legal advice on a business decision,' which is protected."
-
December 13, 2024
Apple Can't Drag Out Privilege Claims Re-Review, Judge Says
A California federal magistrate judge on Friday rejected Apple's argument that Apple and Epic Games should agree on a document-review protocol before Apple re-reviews 57,000 documents it claims are attorney-client privileged in their antitrust fight, telling Apple's counsel such a process would likely drag out litigation without being useful.
-
December 05, 2024
Apple To Appeal Epic's Atty-Client Privilege Challenge Win
Apple and Epic Games told a California federal judge Thursday that they've agreed on a protocol for a special master to re-review 57,000 documents that Apple claims are attorney-client privileged in their antitrust fight, while Apple added that it plans to appeal his finding that its privilege assertions over a sample were overbroad.
-
December 03, 2024
Antitrust Judge Rips Apple's 'Meritless' Doc Privilege Claims
Apple fought uphill Tuesday to convince a California federal magistrate judge that it properly withheld 57,000 documents from Epic Games due to attorney-client privilege in their antitrust fight, with the judge eventually telling its lawyer, "I disagree with everything you're saying, and the fact you're making these meritless arguments causes me concern."
-
November 08, 2024
Apple's Cited Rulings Just Cement Old Precedent, Epic Says
What Apple contends are new rulings from a California appeals court and the U.S. Supreme Court are really just affirmations of existing precedent that change nothing about the injunction blocking the iPhone maker's rules against steering users to alternative payment systems, Epic Games has told a California federal judge.
-
October 28, 2024
Apple Withholding Docs In Monopoly Row, Epic Says
Epic Games and Apple continued on in a discovery dispute in Epic's suit accusing Apple of monopolizing the iOS app distribution and in-app payment processing markets, with the video game company saying in a joint letter filed Friday that Apple is withholding "tens of thousands" of responsive documents.
-
October 04, 2024
Epic Doubts Apple's Privilege Assertions In Antitrust Fight
Epic Games told a California federal magistrate judge overseeing discovery in its antitrust compliance fight with Apple on Friday that it's concerned Apple has wrongly asserted privilege in more than half the documents it has declined to produce, while adding "we don't want to spend months here duking this out."
-
September 30, 2024
Apple Says Epic's Injunction Can't Survive New Precedent
Apple Inc. asked a California federal judge Monday to vacate or at least narrow the injunction won by Epic Games Inc. against the iPhone maker's anti-steering rules, arguing that two recent rulings suggest that the judge got the state antitrust law wrong.
-
September 30, 2024
Epic Judge Slams Apple's 'Bad Behavior' Managing Discovery
A California federal magistrate judge overseeing discovery in Epic Games' antitrust compliance fight with Apple has refused to grant Apple's request to extend a compliance deadline to produce documents, slamming the tech giant for its "bad behavior" and eleventh-hour extension request and noting Apple has extensive resources to meet Monday's deadline.
-
August 08, 2024
Apple Must Produce Docs In Epic Antitrust Fight By Sept. 30
A California federal judge overseeing discovery in Epic Games' antitrust compliance fight with Apple gave the iPhone-maker a Sept. 30 deadline to hand over documentation on its response to foreign antitrust regulations and other internal documents, rejecting Apple's suggested December deadline and calling the 92,000-document review large but "not huge."