Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Crown Castle Fiber LLC v. City of Rochester, New York et al
Case Number:
6:20-cv-06866
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 03, 2024
Rochester Says Chevron Ruling May Impact Telecom Fee Deal
The city of Rochester is clashing with Verizon Wireless, Crown Castle and Extenet in New York federal court over the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court's recent ruling overturning the Chevron deference amid litigation over how much the city can charge telecoms to do business.
-
February 28, 2024
Rochester Loses Telecom Fee Bench Trial Over Hearsay
Verizon Communications and Crown Castle Fiber have won their fight with Rochester, New York, over how much the city can charge telecoms to do business after the New York federal judge overseeing the case declared the city's cost spreadsheet to be hearsay.
-
January 12, 2023
Rochester, Telecoms Inch Toward Excess Fee Settlement
The city of Rochester, New York, is going to make one more attempt to settle its differences with Verizon Communications Inc. and Crown Castle Fiber LLC over how much the city can charge telecoms to do business in the town before the suits head for trial this spring.
-
August 23, 2022
Verizon, Fiber Co. Can't Hang Up Fee Fights With Rochester
A New York federal judge is dialing up a pair of trials to decide how much the city of Rochester can charge telecom companies to do business in town, denying Verizon and Crown Castle Fiber LLC early victories in two suits over the allegedly excessive fees.
-
November 02, 2021
Telecom Co. Eyes Early Win In Excess Facilities Fees Suit
A fiber optics company urged a New York federal judge to grant it a win before trial in its suit claiming the city of Rochester is hampering its ability to provide telecommunications services to consumers by charging it excessive facilities fees.
-
October 20, 2020
Fiber Telecom Co. Sues Rochester Over Excess Facilities Fees
Telecommunications infrastructure company Crown Castle Fiber LLC sued the city of Rochester in New York federal court Tuesday, claiming its municipal code enforcing over $300,000 in facilities fees violates federal and state law.