Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Federal Trade Commission v. Dennis
Case Number:
1:20-cv-03538
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Boies Schiller
- Davis Wright Tremaine
- Dhillon Law Group
- Gallagher Evelius
- Greenberg Traurig
- Levin Law PA
- Redgrave LLP
- Venable LLP
Government Agencies
-
March 16, 2022
Raging Bull To Pay $2.4M Over Stock Earnings Claims
Raging Bull and its principals will pay more than $2.4 million to settle the Federal Trade Commission's allegations that the stock information website made unsubstantiated claims, according to documents filed in Maryland federal court.
-
January 14, 2021
Stock Tip Site Raging Bull Denies FTC's Fraud Accusations
The subscription-based stock trade advice website Raging Bull is staunchly denying claims from the Federal Trade Commission that its stock experts are actually market losers who have defrauded their customers out of $137 million.
-
December 07, 2020
FTC Says Stock Tip Site Raging Bull Really A Fraudulent Bear
The Federal Trade Commission filed a lawsuit in Maryland federal court Monday against subscription stock trade advice website Raging Bull, alleging while it purports to offer market tips from experts — including so-called COVID-19 "plays" — it actually uses deceptive marketing to defraud consumers of over $137 million.