Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
STATE OF COLORADO et al v. GOOGLE LLC
Case Number:
1:20-cv-03715
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Berkowitz Lichtstein
- Dechert LLP
- Foley & Lardner
- Larson LLP
- McCune Law
- Orrick Herrington
- Patterson Belknap
- Ropes & Gray
- Williams & Connolly
- Wilson Sonsini
Companies
Government Agencies
- Commonwealth of Massachusetts
- State of Maryland
- State of Nevada
- State of Tennessee
- U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 15, 2023
Apple's AI, Merger VPs Fight To Avoid Google Witness Stand
Apple Inc. thinks providing 21.5 hours of deposition testimony and more than 1 million pages of documents is enough participation in the U.S. Department of Justice's looming trial over Google LLC's search dominance, telling a D.C. federal judge in a filing unsealed Monday that there's no need for three company vice presidents to testify live.
-
August 04, 2023
DOJ Bound For Google Search Trial, Core Claims Intact
A D.C. federal judge teed up the first Big Tech antitrust conduct case of the modern era for trial in an order unsealed Friday preserving the core of the U.S. Department of Justice case accusing Google of anti-competitively exclusive contracts making its search engine the default on phones and browsers.
-
August 02, 2023
DOJ Wants Limits On Google's Search Innovation Arguments
The U.S. Department of Justice and state-level enforcers are looking to prevent Google from arguing during a coming September trial that the quality of its products offers a complete defense to claims that it monopolizes search and search advertising markets.
-
June 28, 2023
Google Must Turn Over Memos For Search Case Sanctions Bid
A D.C. federal court on Wednesday ordered Google to turn over memos instructing employees to preserve internal chats after claims from the U.S. Department of Justice and state enforcers that the company destroyed evidence in their search monopolization case.
-
April 27, 2023
Google Search Judge Needs More Info On Chat Sanctions Bid
The D.C. federal judge overseeing federal and state enforcers' actions accusing Google of monopolizing search and search advertising markets called for more information Thursday about a pending bid to sanction the company for deleting internal employee chats.
-
April 17, 2023
DOJ, Google Dispute When Gov't Discovered Chat Deletions
The U.S. Department of Justice's bid to sanction Google for failing to preserve internal chats may come down to timing, according to last week's hearing and a DOJ filing, unsealed Monday, that continued to assail the search giant's claim that government attorneys knew about Google's chat deletion policies for years.
-
March 20, 2023
Google Calls Sanctions Bid In Search Monopoly Case Too Late
Google has urged a District of Columbia federal court to reject a bid from the U.S. Department of Justice and a group of states for sanctions over its deletion of employee chats in a search and search advertising monopolization case, arguing that the effort comes far too late.
-
March 06, 2023
Google Opposes Amicus Efforts In DOJ, AG's Antitrust Case
Google has opposed proposed amici briefs from an antitrust nonprofit and behavioral economists in litigation accusing the company of monopolizing online search and search advertising, saying Friday their interests are already represented by the plaintiffs and the motions are untimely.
-
February 16, 2023
DOJ, States Say Google Can't Yet Ditch Search Engine Suits
The U.S. Department of Justice and a coalition of states have urged a D.C. federal court to reject Google's attempt to ditch landmark antitrust litigation over its default search engine, arguing that accepting the company's approach to the dispute "would make the antitrust laws bow to admitted monopolists."
-
February 03, 2023
Google's Antitrust Trouble Is Piling Up
The U.S. Department of Justice's Jan. 24 suit seeking to break up Google's advertising business adds to a mountain of antitrust litigation already targeting the tech giant. In addition to federal enforcement, Google is also facing cases from dozens of state-level enforcers, as well as from developers, advertisers and consumers, all accusing it of monopolizing various digital markets.