Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
STATE OF COLORADO et al v. GOOGLE LLC
Case Number:
1:20-cv-03715
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Berkowitz Lichtstein
- Dechert LLP
- Foley & Lardner
- Larson LLP
- McCune Law
- Orrick Herrington
- Patterson Belknap
- Ropes & Gray
- Williams & Connolly
- Wilson Sonsini
Companies
Government Agencies
- Commonwealth of Massachusetts
- State of Maryland
- State of Nevada
- State of Tennessee
- U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 31, 2025
Apple Wants Google Search Case Paused For Appeal
Apple filed an emergency motion asking a Washington, D.C., federal court to pause the landmark monopolization case targeting Google's search dominance while it appeals a decision refusing to allow the company to participate in the upcoming remedies trial.
-
January 29, 2025
Apple Will Appeal Denial Of Bid To Defend Google Search Deal
Apple said Wednesday that it will appeal an order refusing to let it intervene in the government's search monopolization case against Google to defend a multibillion-dollar revenue-sharing deal that makes Google the default search engine for the Safari browser.
-
January 28, 2025
Apple Can't Defend Google Revenue Deal In DOJ Search Case
A D.C. federal judge has refused to let Apple intervene to defend the billions it gets from Google to keep the search giant as the default for Safari browser, holding the iPhone maker waited too long to intervene in the Justice Department's monopolization lawsuit, and the company's involvement now would be too disruptive.
-
January 09, 2025
DOJ Fights Apple's Intervention In Google Search Remedies
The U.S. Department of Justice is opposing Apple Inc.'s "eleventh-hour effort" to have a say in what should be a proper fix for Google's search monopoly, telling a D.C. federal judge that the company has had ample opportunity to defend its lucrative revenue-sharing agreement with Google.
-
December 23, 2024
Google Counters DOJ's Proposed Chrome Sale
Google has countered the Justice Department's proposed divestiture of the Chrome browser in a brief filed in D.C. federal court arguing the proper fix for its illegal search monopoly would be to allow Android phone makers and browser companies the ability to more readily pick rival engines.
-
December 20, 2024
No, Microsoft Isn't Driving DOJ's Google Antitrust Suit: Judge
A D.C. federal judge pushed back Friday on Google's efforts to paint Microsoft as the true plaintiff in the Justice Department's search monopolization lawsuit, casting doubt during a hearing that Google should get even more information about Microsoft's relationship with ChatGPT-maker OpenAI.
-
November 26, 2024
Google Search Judge Says AI Will Affect Remedy Phase
The judge overseeing the government's search monopolization case against Google suggested Tuesday in D.C. federal court that artificial intelligence is shifting the market and will likely play a role in the remedies the court imposes on Google for allegedly violating antitrust law.
-
November 21, 2024
DOJ Search Fixes Would Remake Google, Break Off Chrome
To give rival search engines a fighting chance against Google's illegal monopoly and its massive data and structural advantages, the Justice Department asked a D.C. federal judge Wednesday for sweeping changes that would divest the Chrome browser, open up Android devices and guarantee access to underlying search data.
-
November 21, 2024
DOJ Urges Chrome, Android Sales In Google Case
The U.S. Department of Justice late Wednesday formally asked a Washington, D.C., federal judge to order a range of steps to end Google's monopolization of general search services and the text ads shown alongside search results, most notably by forcing the company to spin off the Chrome browser.
-
October 22, 2024
DOJ Wants Google's AI Search Docs, Apple Entry Thoughts
An expansive look into Google's artificial intelligence pipeline and the prospects of Apple entering into the search market are top of mind for the Justice Department as it pursues remedies meant to address the online giant's illegal monopolization of search, according to a D.C. federal court filing Monday.