Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Ericsson Inc. et al v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al
Case Number:
2:21-cv-00001
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 05, 2021
Ex-Fed. Circ. Chiefs Spar Over Ericsson, Samsung Patent Row
Former Federal Circuit Chief Judge Paul Michel on Tuesday backed Ericsson's request to have a Texas court bar Samsung from enforcing a Chinese court order requiring the companies' standard-essential patent dispute to be heard in Wuhan, putting him at odds with his Federal Circuit successor Randall Rader.
-
January 04, 2021
Rader Tells Gilstrap China Can Handle Essential IP Fight
Former Federal Circuit Chief Judge Randall R. Rader has defended the strength of China's patent courts and their ability to handle licensing disputes over standard-essential patents, urging a Texas federal judge to let Chinese litigation between Ericsson and Samsung proceed.