Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
March 04, 2021
Johnson & Johnson, et al., Petitioners v. Gail L. Ingham, et al.
Case Number:
20-1223
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Firms
- Dechert LLP
- Foley Hoag
- Gallivan White
- Goldstein & Russell
- Hogan Lovells
- Hollingsworth LLP
- Lanier Law Firm
- Mayer Brown
- Reed Smith
- Taft Stettinius
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
June 01, 2021
High Court Won't Hear J&J Challenge To $2.1B Talc Verdict
The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to take on Johnson & Johnson's challenge to a $2.1 billion verdict awarded in Missouri to nearly two dozen women who blamed the purported asbestos in its talcum powder for their ovarian cancer, brushing aside the company's argument that too many claims were combined for a single trial.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login