Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
IN RE: January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation
Case Number:
1:21-md-02989
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action, Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Davis Polk
- Edelson Lechtzin
- Lavin Rindner
- Law Offices of R. Tamara de Silva
- Hunton Andrews
- Estelle & Kennedy
- Levin Sedran
- Steven Williams Law
- Pessah Law Group
- Stoel Rives
- K&L Gates
- Kiesel Law
- Ross Aronstam
- Lewis & Llewellyn
- Shumaker Loop
- Winston & Strawn
- Friday Eldredge
- Derek Smith Law Group
- Gustafson Gluek
- Cera LLP
- Grabar Law
- Evangelista Worley
- Audet & Partners
- Hach Rose Schirripa
- Edelson PC
- Mulherin Rehfeldt
- Burstyn Law
- Gucovschi Law
- Dechert LLP
- Fishback Dominick
- Safirstein Law
- McDonald Worley
- Wenzel Fenton
- Morgan Lewis
- Farella Braun
- Loftus & Eisenberg
- Haynes Boone
- Quinn Emanuel
- Katten Muchin
- Blaise & Nitschke
- Markun Zusman
- Foley & Lardner
- Scott Hirsch Law Group
- Bursor & Fisher
- Barnes & Thornburg
- Keller Rohrback
- Reich & Binstock
- Maderal Byrne
- Napoli Shkolnik
- D. Miller & Associates
- Domina Law Group
- Hill Ward Henderson
- Bird Marella
- Manatt Phelps
- Ellis George
- Vedder Price
- Klafter Lesser
- Wiggin & Dana
- OlsenDaines
- Varnell & Warwick
- The Office of Craig C. Reilly
- Gibson Dunn
- Migliaccio & Rathod
- Sanford Heisler
- Siri & Glimstad
- Joseph Saveri Law Firm
- Cohen & McMullen
- Homer Bonner
- Wilson Elser
- Clark Hill
- Green & Noblin PC
- Cravath Swaine
- Law Offices of Gary R Carlin
- Bartlit Beck
- Lowenstein Sandler
- Shook Hardy
- Law Offices of Joshua B. Kons
- Paul Weiss
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Ferraro Law Firm
- Wilson Sonsini
- Seward & Kissel
- Kantrowitz Goldhamer
- Weissman & Dervishi
- Poulin Willey
- Jenner & Block
- GrayRobinson
- Latham & Watkins
- White & Case
Companies
- Cash App
- Sequoia Capital Operations LLC
- Alpaca Securities LLC
- Peak6 Investments LP
- Block Inc.
- The Charles Schwab Corp.
- Electronic Transaction Clearing Inc.
- Interactive Brokers Group Inc.
- Stash Financial Inc.
- Melvin Capital Management LP
- Robinhood Markets Inc.
- Webull Financial LLC
- Ally Financial Inc.
- Barclays PLC
- Point72 LP
- Apex Clearing Corporation
- Firstrade Securities Inc.
- Citadel Enterprise Americas LLC
- Bank of America Corp.
- TD Ameritrade Holding Corp.
- Morgan Stanley
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 13, 2025
Robinhood Users Oppose Arbitration Of 'Meme Stock' Claims
Stock trading platform Robinhood has failed to lay the groundwork for sending user disputes to arbitration, seven users of the platform claimed Monday in a bid to keep their claims in federal court over the company's 2021 suspension certain so-called meme stock trades.
-
December 10, 2024
Robinhood Seeks Arb. For Remaining Meme Stock MDL Suits
Stock trading platform Robinhood urged a Florida federal court to send to arbitration the seven remaining individual suits brought against it as part of a multidistrict litigation over the platform's decision to freeze trading in certain so-called meme stocks amid a social-media fueled run on shares of those issuers.
-
July 24, 2024
Meme Stock Investor Opposes Robinhood Settlement For Now
A meme stock investor on Wednesday urged a Florida federal judge to deny a settlement between Robinhood and other traders who say they sustained losses when the exchange restricted trading of certain stocks during a social media fueled run, since he says he hasn't received any details on the deal.
-
May 29, 2024
Robinhood Reaches Deal To End 'Meme Stock' Investor Suit
Robinhood Markets Inc. told a Florida federal judge Tuesday that it has reached a settlement with investors to resolve a suit over the trading platform's suspension of so-called meme stock purchases, saying it anticipates finalizing the deal within the next two weeks.
-
April 22, 2024
Robinhood 'Meme Stock' Investors Lose New Class Cert. Bid
A Florida federal judge has denied a bid from Robinhood investors to file a new motion for class certification in a suit over the trading platform's suspension of so-called meme stock purchases, saying the deadline for class certification has passed and the investors have not shown a good reason to extend it.
-
March 13, 2024
Robinhood Says Investors Shouldn't Get Discovery Extension
Trading platform Robinhood has told a Florida federal court that it should not be required to produce documents requested by investors in their "eleventh hour" motion to extend discovery in a suit alleging investors were damaged when Robinhood suspended purchases of so-called meme stocks to avoid a purported liquidity problem.
-
November 14, 2023
Investors Denied Class Cert. In Robinhood Meme Stock Suit
A Miami federal judge has refused to certify a class of investors in so-called meme stocks who alleged they were hurt when trading platform Robinhood suspended purchases of those stocks to avoid a purported liquidity problem, finding the investors failed to show that common issues predominate their claims.
-
May 01, 2023
Investors Seek Cert. In Robinhood 'Meme Stock' MDL
Investors in so-called meme stocks who allege they were hurt when trading platform Robinhood suspended purchases of those stocks to avoid a purported liquidity problem have asked a Miami federal judge to certify their proposed class, contending that the company has made a number of "unorthodox, convoluted" arguments that should not prevent the class from being certified.
-
January 10, 2023
Apex Meme Stock Suit Loses On 4th And Final Try
Meme stock investors failed in their last attempt to plead claims against broker-dealer Apex Clearing Corp. after a Florida federal judge on Monday dismissed their suit looking to hold Apex liable for trading losses and declined to give them another shot at amending their complaint.
-
October 17, 2022
Robinhood Investors Urge 11th Circ. To Save Meme Stock Suit
Investors who brought a proposed class action against Robinhood Markets Inc. alleging it illegally restrained trading on its app have urged the Eleventh Circuit to reverse the dismissal of their case, arguing a lower court wrongly determined the claim is inapplicable because the company's business is too different from that of another defendant.