Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Plymouth County Retirement Association v. Array Technologies, Inc. et al
Case Number:
1:21-cv-04390
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- DiCello Levitt
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Labaton Keller
- Motley Rice
- Pomerantz LLP
- Robbins Geller
- Rolnick Kramer
- Ropes & Gray
- Skadden Arps
- Sullivan & Cromwell
Companies
- Array Technologies Inc.
- Barclays PLC
- Credit Suisse Group AG
- Guggenheim Partners LLC
- Johnson Rice & Co. LLC
- JPMorgan Chase & Co.
- Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc.
- Morgan Stanley
- Nomura Holdings Inc.
- Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.
- Piper Sandler Cos.
- Roth Capital Partners LLC
- The Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 19, 2023
NY Judge Says Price Spike Suit Against Solar Co. 'Collapses'
A New York federal judge on Friday tossed a proposed securities class action alleging solar panel infrastructure company Array Technologies made false statements concerning how rising steel prices during the pandemic would impact its business, saying the investors cannot claim Array should've predicted the future.
-
May 17, 2021
Solar Frame Co. Hid COVID-Linked Costs Spike, Investor Says
Solar panel infrastructure company Array Technologies Inc. was hit Friday with a proposed securities class action alleging that the company failed to disclose that increasing prices for steel and freight transportation would decrease its margins in 2021 as it held a series of public offerings in the past eight months.