Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Binh v. King & Spalding LLP et al
Case Number:
4:21-cv-02234
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 22, 2022
Ex-Client Fights To Revive Claims Against King & Spalding
A former King & Spalding client is urging a Texas federal judge to vacate his previous order and stay a lawsuit against the firm pending the outcome of arbitration proceedings, saying the lawyers are protesting "long and loud over an issue that causes them no harm."
-
January 13, 2022
King & Spalding Can Arbitrate Fight With Ex-Client
King & Spalding LLP has won its bid to arbitrate a dispute with a former client who was awarded more than $45 million against the Vietnamese government, after a Texas federal court found that a litigation funding contract's arbitration requirement governs the disagreement.
-
August 25, 2021
Ex-King & Spalding Client Fights To Keep Fee Dispute In Court
A former King & Spalding client who won millions of dollars against the Vietnamese government and is now suing the firm has asked again to have his case heard in front of a Texas state court judge and not in arbitration.
-
August 18, 2021
King & Spalding Says Fee Fight Must Be Arbitrated
King & Spalding is urging a Texas court to force a former client to arbitrate allegations that the firm fraudulently colluded with Burford Capital to maximize fees while representing him in a treaty claim against Vietnam, pointing to an arbitration clause in the underlying fee agreement.
-
August 10, 2021
No Arbitration For King & Spalding Client Fight, Court Hears
A Dutch citizen who accuses King & Spalding LLP of fraudulently colluding with Burford Capital to maximize fees in a treaty claim against Vietnam is fighting the law firm's efforts to send the fee dispute to arbitration, arguing Monday that an arbitration clause in the funding agreement is inapplicable.