Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Philip E. Berger, et al., Petitioners v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, et al.
Case Number:
21-248
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Firms
- Arnold & Porter
- Baker & Hostetler
- Consovoy McCarthy
- Cooley LLP
- Cooper & Kirk
- Dhillon Law Group
- Dickinson Wright
- Holtzman Vogel
- Poyner Spruill
- Willkie Farr
Companies
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 23, 2022
Justices Allow NC Lawmakers To Join Voter ID Case
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday that two leaders of the GOP-controlled North Carolina General Assembly are entitled to join their state's Democratic attorney general in defense of a contentious voter ID law amid worries that the Tarheel State's chief legal officer is not vigorously defending the measure in court.
-
March 21, 2022
Justices Mull Allowing NC Lawmakers To Defend Voter ID Law
The U.S. Supreme Court appeared divided on Monday over whether it should allow the GOP-controlled North Carolina General Assembly to join its state's Democratic attorney general in defense of a contentious voter ID law amid worries that the Tar Heel State's chief legal officer may not vigorously defend the measure.
-
March 18, 2022
Up Next At High Court: Arbitration, More State Intervention
The Supreme Court will tackle a host of arbitration questions when it returns to the bench on Monday for its two-week March argument session, starting with whether circuit courts are giving arbitration clauses "preferential" treatment over other contractual terms and whether U.S. courts can order discovery for use in private commercial arbitration abroad.
-
January 03, 2022
Supreme Court Look Ahead: What's On The Docket In 2022?
The U.S. Supreme Court may have already heard its most controversial cases of the October 2021 term, but the next four months of oral arguments will feature fireworks of their own, including a tour de force on First Amendment law, immigrant rights, climate change policies and much more.
-
November 24, 2021
Justices To Review When Lawmakers Can Intervene In Cases
The U.S. Supreme Court said Wednesday that it will decide whether the North Carolina General Assembly can intervene in defense of the state's photo ID requirement for voting, taking up legal questions that, according to the lawmakers, "strike at the heart of a state's sovereign authority to designate agents to represent its interests in court."