Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Borozny et al. v. RTX Corporation, Pratt & Whitney Division, et al
Case Number:
3:21-cv-01657
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Aeton Law Partners
- Baker & Hostetler
- Ballard Spahr
- Bartko LLP
- Berger Montague
- Brenner Saltzman
- Brown Paindiris
- Cohen Milstein
- Crowell & Moring
- Day Pitney
- DiCello Levitt
- Diserio Martin
- Edelson Lechtzin
- Farmer Brownstein
- Fine Kaplan
- Freed Kanner
- Garrison Levin-Epstein
- Garwin Gerstein
- Gordon Rees
- Grabar Law
- Hagens Berman
- Hausfeld LLP
- Hayber McKenna
- Hurwitz Sagarin
- Izard Kindall
- Joseph Saveri Law Firm
- Keller Postman
- Kirby McInerney
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Kohn Swift
- Korein Tillery
- Koskoff Koskoff
- Latham & Watkins
- Lieff Cabraser
- Livingston Adler
- Lynch Traub
- Maynard Nexsen
- McConnell Family Law Group
- McCune Wright
- McGuireWoods
- Milberg Coleman
- Motley Rice
- Murtha Cullina
- Nussbaum Law Group
- O'Toole & O'Toole
- Petrillo Klein
- Pullman & Comley
- Quinn Emanuel
- Reid & Riege
- Robbins Geller
- Robins Kaplan
- Saxe Doernberger
- Scott&Scott
- Sheppard Mullin
- Shipman & Goodwin
- Silver Golub
- Spears Manning
- Spector Roseman
- Steven Williams Law
- Susman Godfrey
- Zeisler & Zeisler
- Zelle LLP
Companies
- American Staffing Association
- Belcan Corp.
- Collins Aerospace Inc.
- Cyient Ltd.
- Pratt & Whitney
- QuEST Global Services Pte. Ltd.
- Raytheon Technologies Corp.
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 12, 2024
Engineering Firms Ink $26.5M Deals To End 'No-Poach' Claims
Four engineering firms have agreed to shell out a total of $26.5 million, while a fifth has pledged to cooperate, to settle a proposed class action alleging they conspired to restrict hiring through "no-poach" agreements, leaving RTX Corp. unit Pratt & Whitney as the sole defendant, plaintiffs told a Connecticut federal judge on Friday.
-
May 10, 2024
Engineering Firm Inks Latest Deal In Conn. No-Poach Suit
Belcan Engineering Group LLC has reached a deal with a proposed class of aerospace workers who accused it of conspiring with a Raytheon Technologies Corp. subsidiary and others to restrict hiring through anti-competitive "no-poach" agreements, according to a notice filed in Connecticut federal court.
-
April 17, 2024
RTX Investor Sues Brass In Del. For Better Antitrust Oversight
A shareholder of RTX has sued the aerospace and defense giant's current and former officers and directors in Delaware's Court of Chancery, accusing them of failing over a period of at least eight years to prevent antitrust violations in the company's hiring practices.
-
January 24, 2024
Aerospace Contractor Inks $7.4M Deal In Conn. No-Poach Suit
An aerospace subcontractor accused alongside Raytheon Technologies Corp.'s Pratt & Whitney division and others of conspiring to restrict hiring will pay $7.4 million to resolve the antitrust claims, according to a notice filed Wednesday in Connecticut federal court that indicates three other deals are also on the horizon.
-
August 04, 2023
Contractor In Conn. No-Poach Case Files $5.6M Fla. Ch. 11
Parametric Solutions Inc., one of the Pratt & Whitney contractors accused of engaging in an anti-competitive hiring agreement in Connecticut, has filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition in the Southern District of Florida, citing $6.1 million in assets and at least $5.6 million in liabilities.
-
June 05, 2023
Connecticut Cases To Watch: A Midyear Report
Courts in Connecticut are working through thorny legal issues involving controversies of national interest and headline-grabbing public figures, and significant decisions in high-dollar civil cases are possible before the end of 2023.
-
April 06, 2023
Supplier Admits To No-Poach 'Agreement' In Raytheon Case
A supplier to Raytheon Technologies Corp.'s Pratt & Whitney division has admitted that it "voluntarily participated" in a no-poaching agreement among several aerospace companies, but it denied that it knew the deal was illegal and fought several damages demands in a recent filing.
-
March 07, 2023
Raytheon Denies Wrongdoing In Conn. No-Poaching Case
Raytheon Technologies Corp.'s Pratt & Whitney division has denied all wrongdoing in a proposed class action over an alleged no-poaching scheme, saying that any employment actions it undertook were lawful ways to further its "legitimate business interests."
-
February 14, 2023
DOJ Asks Judge To Rethink Order In Raytheon Poaching Case
The U.S. Department of Justice has asked a Connecticut federal judge to reconsider a portion of a ruling in a putative class action accusing Raytheon Technologies Corp.'s Pratt & Whitney division of secretly agreeing with other companies not to recruit or hire its talent in the aerospace sector.
-
January 23, 2023
Pratt & Whitney, 5 Contractors Lose Bid To Toss Antitrust Suit
A proposed antitrust class action against Raytheon Technologies Corp.'s Pratt & Whitney division and several of its aerospace subcontractors can continue, a Connecticut federal court ruled, rejecting the companies' bid to toss out allegations that they worked together to restrict hiring and suppress salaries.