Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Heritage Company Inc v. Hudson Excess Insurance Company et al
Case Number:
4:22-cv-00082
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 23, 2024
Ark. Judge Sides With Insurer's Cyber Policy Interpretation
An Arkansas federal judge ruled an insurer correctly evaluated a telemarketing company's losses from a cyberattack, agreeing that "normal operating expenses" the company paid from revenue during that period aren't included in the loss and that any other interpretation would give the company a windfall.
-
November 16, 2022
Co. Can't Get Windfall From Cyberattack Coverage, Court Told
A now-shuttered telemarketing company's proposed calculation of business interruption coverage for a 2019 cyberattack would impermissibly leave it better off than if it had never been attacked, the company's insurer told an Arkansas federal court.
-
October 03, 2022
Broker, Underwriter Slip Cyberattack Coverage Suit
An Arkansas federal court on Monday dismissed an insurance broker and underwriter from a suit by a now-shuttered telemarketing company seeking coverage for a cyberattack, saying the two were not part of the insurance contract at issue and therefore were not properly sued.
-
April 19, 2022
Broker, Underwriter Want Off Cyberattack Coverage Suit
An insurance broker and underwriter asked on Tuesday to be dropped from a now-shuttered telemarketing company's suit seeking business interruption coverage for a cyberattack, telling an Arkansas federal court they're not under contract with the company.
-
January 31, 2022
Insurers Must Cover Firm For Cyberattack, Ark. Court Told
A now-shuttered telemarketing company told an Arkansas federal court its insurers owe it coverage for a 2019 cyberattack that caused it to suspend operations and reportedly lay off its workforce, saying that its policy was specifically worded to cover that type of business interruption.