Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
In Re: Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
3:17-md-02773
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Multi-district Litigation, Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Allen Matkins
- Alston & Bird
- A&O Shearman
- Baker Botts
- Baker McKenzie
- Barnes & Thornburg
- Barrack Rodos
- Berger Montague
- Berman Tabacco
- Bleichmar Fonti
- BoiesBattin
- Boies Schiller
- Bramson Plutzik
- Cafferty Clobes
- Cleary Gottlieb
- Cotchett Pitre
- Cravath Swaine
- Crowell & Moring
- Dority & Manning
- Eimer Stahl
- Faegre Drinker
- Fenwick & West
- Finkelstein Thompson
- Frank LLP
- Freed Kanner
- Freshfields
- Gibbs Law Group
- Gibson Dunn
- Goodwin Procter
- Guerra LLP
- Hach Rose Schirripa
- Hagens Berman
- Hartley LLP
- Hausfeld LLP
- Herrera Kennedy
- Irell & Manella
- Joseph Saveri Law Firm
- Kaplan Fox
- Keker Van Nest & Peters
- Keller Rohrback
- Kirby McInerney
- Kirkland & Ellis
- K&L Gates
- Korein Tillery
- Kwun Bhansali
- KXT Law
- McGuireWoods
- Milberg Coleman
- Morgan Lewis
- Nassiri & Jung
- Norton Rose
- Paul Weiss
- Pearson Warshaw
- Perkins Coie
- Pettit Kohn
- Pritzker Levine
- Proskauer Rose
- Renne Public Law Group
- Robins Kaplan
- Robinson Calcagnie
- Schneider Wallace
- Sheppard Mullin
- Sher Edling
- Shook Hardy
- Sidley Austin
- Spector Roseman
- Steven Williams Law
- Steyer Lowenthal
- Stueve Siegel
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Susman Godfrey
- Vinson & Elkins
- Weitz & Luxenberg
- Wiggin & Dana
- Williams & Connolly
- WilmerHale
- Wilson Sonsini
- Winston & Strawn
- Wolf Haldenstein
- Zuber Lawler
Companies
- Amazon.com Inc.
- Apple Inc.
- ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
- Best Buy Co. Inc.
- Foxconn
- Google LLC
- Ingram Micro Inc.
- Intel Corp.
- InterDigital Inc.
- Kyocera Corporation
- Lenovo Group Ltd.
- LG Electronics Inc.
- MediaTek Inc.
- Motorola Mobility LLC
- Nokia Corp.
- NVIDIA Corp.
- Pegatron Corp.
- QUALCOMM Inc.
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- Sony Corp.
- Spectrum Management Holding Co.
- Target Corp.
- TD SYNNEX Corp.
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
- T-Mobile US Inc.
- Verizon Communications Inc.
- Wistron Corp.
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 02, 2024
Qualcomm Says 9th Circ. Panel Already Heard Chip Claims
Qualcomm is urging the Ninth Circuit to assign an appeal from phone and tablet buyers looking to revive allegations that the chipmaker uses anti-competitive licensing practices to the same panel that nixed a class certification ruling in the long-running case.
-
March 26, 2024
Consumers Push For New 9th Circ. Panel In Qualcomm Case
Cellphone buyers are coming out strong against Qualcomm's request to have the same Ninth Circuit panel that vacated their class certification hear an appeal to revive the long-running antitrust litigation over the company's licensing practices, saying there is no reason for "meddling with the usual practice for assigning cases."
-
February 27, 2024
Consumers Ask 9th Circ. To Revive Qualcomm Antitrust Case
Cellphone buyers are hoping to revive their beleaguered antitrust case accusing Qualcomm of illegal tying schemes to inflate the price of their chips, telling the Ninth Circuit in their new opening brief to reverse the district court's ruling from September or, at a minimum, toss it to the California Supreme Court to decide whether their state law claims are viable.
-
September 27, 2023
Qualcomm Gets Rest Of Calif. Consumer Chip Case Tossed
A California federal court granted Qualcomm's bid to extinguish the remaining claims from cellphone buyers alleging they overpaid due to the chipmaker's licensing practices, following a loss by federal enforcers on similar claims and the dismantling of a consumer class.
-
May 26, 2023
Consumers Fight Qualcomm Bid To End Antitrust Case
Cellphone buyers accusing Qualcomm of violating antitrust law through chip licensing practices have urged a California federal court not to end the last of what remains of long-running consumer litigation against the company.
-
April 10, 2023
Qualcomm Seeks Final End To Chip-Licensing Antitrust Case
Qualcomm asked a California federal court on Monday to nix what's left of long-running consumer antitrust litigation targeting its chip-licensing practices, saying the cellphone purchaser plaintiffs have no evidence to support their suit's remaining exclusive dealing claim.
-
February 17, 2023
Qualcomm Wants Chip-Licensing Suit Gone Once And For All
Qualcomm asked a California federal judge to tee up what's left of a consumer antitrust suit targeting its chip-licensing practices, a move the technology giant hopes will end the long-running battle with cellphone buyers.
-
January 09, 2023
Calif. Antitrust Claims Against Qualcomm Trimmed
A California federal court has trimmed some allegations from cellphone buyers targeting Qualcomm's chip licensing practices but allowed other allegations under the state's antitrust law to proceed despite the Ninth Circuit's rejection of similar claims under federal law.
-
November 15, 2022
Qualcomm Uses 9th Circ. Win Over FTC To Fight Antitrust Suit
Qualcomm urged a California federal judge on Tuesday to toss a putative class action from cellphone buyers alleging they overpaid due to the semiconductor giant's anti-competitive chip licensing practices, arguing that an amended complaint doesn't differ from a Federal Trade Commission suit against the company already axed by the Ninth Circuit.
-
September 16, 2022
Buyers Defend Qualcomm Antitrust Case After FTC's Loss
Cellphone buyers alleging they overpaid due to Qualcomm's chip licensing practices have urged a California federal court not to nix their case, insisting that their amended complaint differs from an antitrust suit previously tossed by the Ninth Circuit against the company.