Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Lamie v. LendingTree, LLC
Case Number:
3:22-cv-00307
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 28, 2024
Attys To Receive $291K After LendingTree Data Breach Deal
Attorneys representing a proposed class of consumers in a data breach suit against online lending marketplace LendingTree will receive over $291,000 for their work brokering an $875,000 settlement, a North Carolina federal judge has decided.
-
July 21, 2023
LendingTree Inks $875K Deal Over NC Data Breach
LendingTree has agreed to pay $875,000 to a proposed class of consumers to end a lawsuit alleging the online loan marketplace negligently exposed the personal data of at least 200,000 people in a data breach.
-
May 04, 2023
LendingTree NC Data Breach Suit Heads To Mediation
LendingTree and two consumers told a North Carolina federal court on Thursday they plan mediation to resolve allegations the online loan marketplace negligently exposed the personal data of at least 200,000 people in a data breach.
-
July 12, 2022
LendingTree Downplayed Scope Of Data Breach, Suit Says
A Massachusetts resident hit LendingTree LLC with a proposed data breach class action in North Carolina federal court Monday, accusing the online lending company of negligently exposing highly sensitive information of more than 200,000 consumers, including individuals who never used its services, and then downplaying the scope of the breach.