Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
PITTSBURGH NEWSPAPER PRINTING PRESSMENS/PAPER HANDLERS LOCAL UNION 24M/9N, et al v. THE NEWSPAPER, NEWSPRINT, MAGAZINE AND FILM DELIVERY DRIVERSHELPERS, AND HANDLERS, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 211/205 et al
Case Number:
2:22-cv-01207
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
-
September 27, 2022
Unions Fight Paper's Sanctions Bid In Health Costs Suit
A group of unions representing Pittsburgh Post-Gazette employees withdrew their challenge to the newspaper's health insurance funding because circumstances changed, not because the lawsuit was frivolous, so they don't deserve to be sanctioned for filing the litigation, the unions told a Pennsylvania federal judge.
-
September 13, 2022
Paper Wants Unions To Pay Fees In Dropped Health Costs Suit
The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette wants four unions to pay the fees it incurred fighting now-withdrawn litigation over health care costs, telling a Pennsylvania federal judge that the unions' lawsuit was an attempt to "trick the court" into legitimizing a theory that would support their unfair labor practice charges against the newspaper.
-
August 31, 2022
Unions Drop Health Cost Suit Against Pa. Newspaper
Four unions that sued the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette in an effort to force the newspaper to cover workers' health and life insurance premium increases have dropped their suit, according to a notice of voluntary dismissal filed in Pennsylvania federal court.
-
August 26, 2022
Pa. Newspaper Denies Obligation To Cover Health Costs
The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette urged a Pennsylvania federal judge to shoot down four unions' motion for an injunction that would force the newspaper to cover workers' health insurance premium increases, disputing the argument that it is contractually obligated to make the payments.
-
August 22, 2022
Pa. Newspaper Endangering Workers' Health Care, Unions Say
Four unions representing employees of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette sued the newspaper in Pennsylvania federal court on Monday, accusing it of placing workers at risk of losing their health and life insurance by refusing to ensure that their monthly premiums are fully funded.