Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Floyd v. Amazon.com Inc et al
Case Number:
2:22-cv-01599
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Arete Law Group
- Clifford Chance
- Davis Wright Tremaine
- Hagens Berman
- McKool Smith
- Orrick Herrington
- Redgrave LLP
- Sidley Austin
- Weil Gotshal
- Williams & Connolly
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 11, 2025
Hagens Berman Sanctioned Over Disappearing Client
Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP is facing monetary sanctions in a proposed class action against Apple and Amazon, after a Washington federal judge said the firm misled her about a problem client who disappeared and wasted the court's time in the process.
-
March 10, 2025
Hagens Berman Comms With Ghosting Client Kept Privileged
Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP doesn't have to turn over texts and emails with a client who disappeared from a putative class action against Apple and Amazon, a Washington federal judge has ruled, despite the tech giants' accusations that the firm lied about those communications.
-
February 06, 2025
Judge Questions Firm's Candor In Apple, Amazon Docs Row
A Washington federal judge said on Thursday there was "troubling shifting" around Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP's explanation of texts and emails with a client who disappeared from a proposed class action targeting Amazon and Apple, while also saying it might not matter because the firm found substitute plaintiffs.
-
December 18, 2024
Hagens Berman Says Apple, Amazon Doc Demand Is Off Base
Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP is firing back against Apple and Amazon's bid to force the turnover of texts and emails with a client who disappeared from a putative class action against the tech giants, calling the spat an opportunistic attack "based on a fiction."
-
December 03, 2024
Tech Giants Seek Firm's Communications With Elusive Client
Apple and Amazon want Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP to turn over texts and emails with a client who disappeared from a putative class action against the tech giants, to determine whether the plaintiff consented to the case continuing in his absence.
-
November 06, 2024
Seattle Judge Wants Plaintiff's Comms In IPad Antitrust Suit
A Seattle federal judge has ordered Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP to produce its communications with a client who allegedly ghosted the firm before determining if the attorneys may withdraw from representing the class representative in a proposed antitrust class action against Apple and Amazon.
-
November 05, 2024
Hagens Berman Defends Bid To Ditch AWOL Apple Suit Client
A Washington federal judge expressed skepticism on Tuesday that Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP was within its rights to substitute a proposed class representative in an antitrust case against Amazon and Apple earlier this year when the lead plaintiff stopped communicating with the firm.
-
October 22, 2024
Hagens Berman Tells Amazon, Apple: Sure, Sanction Client
Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP is fine with a Washington federal court sanctioning the firm's client — formerly the lead plaintiff — in a putative antitrust class action against Apple and Amazon, saying it shares their goal of compelling document production after the plaintiff ghosted his attorneys.
-
October 07, 2024
Apple, Amazon Urge Sanctions For Absent Antitrust Plaintiff
A no-show named plaintiff should be sanctioned for ignoring discovery obligations in a putative antitrust class action over Apple and Amazon's third-party vendor restrictions for iPhone and iPad sales, the two tech giants have told a Washington federal judge.
-
October 01, 2024
Apple, Amazon Hint Hagens Berman Lacked Client's OK
Amazon and Apple blasted Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP for seeking to withdraw as counsel for the no-show original lead plaintiff in an antitrust suit targeting iPhone and iPad sales, hinting that the firm continued to pursue the case even after knowing its client wished to drop out.