Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Simply Wireless, Inc v. T-Mobile US, Inc
Case Number:
22-2211
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 14, 2024
4th Circ. Says T-Mobile Must Face 'Simply Prepaid' TM Fight
The Fourth Circuit revived a Virginia-based telecommunications company's infringement suit against T-Mobile, ruling that Simply Wireless had done enough to show it was planning to revamp its "Simply Prepaid" branding and hadn't abandoned the trademark when T-Mobile began using it.
-
November 30, 2023
IP Forecast: Beauty And The Copyright-Protected Beast
A federal courthouse in Oakland will be center stage next week for a jury trial over allegations that Disney owes profits from the billion-dollar Emma Watson blockbuster "Beauty and the Beast" remake to ex-Microsoft executive Steve Perlman's digital effects company for infringing copyright-protected software to make the movie's live-action beast. Here's a look at that case — plus all the other major intellectual property matters on deck in the coming week.
-
March 17, 2023
Cellphone Co. Seeks To Revive TM Suit Against T-Mobile
Wireless cellphone company Simply Wireless asked the Fourth Circuit to revive its trademark infringement claim against T-Mobile over the telecom giant's use of the "Simply Prepaid" trademark, arguing that while the district court sided with T-Mobile because Simply Wireless had not used the trademark in three years, the company had enough proof that it planned to resume use to create an issue of fact.