Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Bruce Horti, et al v. Nestle Healthcare Nutrition, Inc.
Case Number:
22-16832
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
December 13, 2023
Nestle Drink Buyers' False Ad Suit Gets Boost At 9th Circ.
A Ninth Circuit panel on Wednesday revived a proposed class action alleging Nestle tricked Boost Glucose Control drink buyers into thinking the beverage can treat diabetes, saying the plaintiffs have sufficiently alleged that the labeling at issue was likely to mislead a reasonable consumer.
-
December 06, 2023
Buyers Of Nestle Boost Urge 9th Circ. To Revive False Ad Suit
Boost Glucose Control drink buyers urged the Ninth Circuit at a hearing Wednesday to revive their proposed class action alleging that Nestle Healthcare Nutrition tricked them into thinking the drink can treat diabetes, arguing that they never claimed they thought it was a "miracle drug," but rather they understood it to help manage glucose levels.
-
June 08, 2023
Nestle Asks 9th Circ. To Toss 'Implausible' False Ad Suit
Nestle Healthcare Nutrition Inc. is asking the Ninth Circuit to throw out for good a suit alleging that its "Boost Glucose Control" drinks trick buyers into thinking they can prevent or treat diabetes, saying the trial court was right to find that the claims are implausible.