Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Iverson, Larry et al v. J. David Tax Law, LLC
Case Number:
3:23-cv-00718
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
-
June 04, 2024
Tax Law Firm Can't Kick Ex-Clients' Class Suit To Arbitration
Former clients of a Florida-based tax law firm who live in Wisconsin can move forward with their proposed class action accusing the firm of malpractice and charging illegal fees, a Wisconsin federal judge ruled Tuesday, rejecting the firm's requests to toss the suit or move it to arbitration.
-
March 11, 2024
Fla. Tax Law Firm Fights Class Cert. In Wisconsin Fraud Row
A Florida-based tax law firm has asked a Wisconsin federal judge to trim a proposed class action fraud suit launched by former customers claiming the firm solicited fees without performing work.
-
October 24, 2023
Fla. Tax Firm Says Bilking Claims In Wis. Must Be Arbitrated
A Florida-based tax law firm facing a proposed class action alleging it ripped off clients by taking fees for services it couldn't deliver urged a Wisconsin federal judge Monday to scuttle the suit and send it to arbitration.
-
October 18, 2023
Fla. Tax Firm Faces Class Claims For Allegedly Bilking Clients
A Florida-based tax law firm is facing a proposed class action in Wisconsin federal court alleging that it solicited fees for work it never performed and misled clients about its ability to do business in the state.