Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
WORKERS UNITED v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Case Number:
2:23-cv-04036
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 27, 2024
Starbucks Says Comments On Union Views Not Defamatory
Starbucks urged a Pennsylvania federal court to toss claims that it defamed a union by framing it as favoring violence and terrorism, arguing that the challenged statements were expressions of opinion that could not be disproved and thus could not be defamatory.
-
February 13, 2024
Starbucks Made Statements With Actual Malice, Union Says
Workers United accused Starbucks of posting statements with actual malice that relate to the union's now-deleted tweet saying "Solidarity with Palestine," telling a Pennsylvania federal court that the coffee chain implied that the union "committed a felony."
-
October 19, 2023
Starbucks, Union Duel Over IP After Pro-Palestine Tweets
Starbucks Corp. alleged Wednesday that the union representing its baristas hijacked its name and logos, leading to calls for a boycott against the coffee giant following union tweets supporting Palestine, while the union claimed that Starbucks falsely accused it of supporting terrorism as part of its ongoing anti-union campaign.