Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Uniformed Professional Fire Fighters Association of Connecticut et al v. 3M Company et al
Case Number:
3:24-cv-01101
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Butler Snow LLP
- Carroll & Weiss LLP
- Dechert LLP
- Freeman Mathis
- Gibson Dunn
- Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani
- Hinckley Allen
- Hinshaw & Culbertson
- Lewis Brisbois
- Maron Marvel
- Mayer Brown
- Natale & Wolinetz
- Orrick Herrington
- O'Sullivan McCormack
- Parker Poe
- Robinson Bradshaw
- Ryan Ryan Deluca
- Shook Hardy
- Silver Golub
- Spears Manning
- Wiggin & Dana
Companies
- 3M Co.
- Corteva Inc.
- DuPont de Nemours Inc.
- Elevate Textiles Inc.
- Gentex Corp.
- InterTech Group Inc.
- Milliken & Company Inc.
- The Chemours Co.
- W. L. Gore & Associates Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 10, 2024
3M Can't Put Pause On Connecticut Firefighters' PFAS Suit
A Connecticut federal judge on Thursday declined to let 3M Co. and other companies put a stay on a proposed class action by firefighters alleging their turnout gear contains so-called forever chemicals while the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation decides whether to roll it into a South Carolina MDL.
-
August 19, 2024
3M Wants Conn. Firefighters' PFAS Case Paused For MDL
3M has asked a Connecticut federal court to stay a proposed class action by firefighters who wore technical gear containing so-called forever chemicals until there's a decision on whether to transfer the suit to a multidistrict litigation in South Carolina.
-
June 25, 2024
Conn. Firefighters Sue Over PFAS In Protective Gear
Connecticut firefighters slapped 3M, DuPont and 17 others with a proposed class action on Tuesday, alleging they have been exposed to dangerous levels of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, contained in their protective gear manufactured and sold by the companies.