Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Blankenship v. FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY
Case Number:
2:24-cv-03003
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
November 25, 2024
Broker Appeals For Pause of FINRA's 'Unconstitutional' Case
A Philadelphia-area broker challenging the constitutionality of Financial Industry Regulatory Authority's in-house proceedings told a Pennsylvania federal judge on Monday the regulator's case against him should be put on ice while he argues his case before the Third Circuit.
-
September 04, 2024
FINRA Beats Post-Jarkesy Challenge To Enforcement Powers
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority has beaten back a broker's bid to use the U.S. Supreme Court's recent Jarkesy decision to challenge its enforcement regime, after a Pennsylvania federal judge found other high court precedent barred him from hearing the broker's constitutional challenge to the regulator's proceedings.
-
July 30, 2024
FINRA Says Jarkesy Doesn't Apply To Its Internal Proceedings
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority is opposing a broker's attempt to get the regulator's internal proceedings against him tossed, saying that he has no case under the U.S. Supreme Court's recent Jarkesy decision because FINRA is not a government regulator subject to the same constitutional challenges as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
-
July 11, 2024
Broker Says FINRA Owes Him Jury Trial After Jarkesy Ruling
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority has been hit with a suit from a member who says the regulator's allegations in an internal proceeding to sanction and expel him are assertions of common law fraud and therefore must be brought before a court and jury under the U.S. Supreme Court's recent Jarkesy decision.