Comcast Turns 1: Trends In Class Certification

Law360, New York ( March 6, 2014, 3:31 PM EST) -- Many of us believed that the U. S. Supreme Court's March 27, 2013, decision in Comcast Corp. v. Behrend[1] signaled a continued trend to make class certification the "exception" rather than the rule. The court's earlier opinion in Wal-Mart v. Dukes required lower courts to analyze the putative class's liability theory to ensure that class members suffer the "same injury. " In Comcast, the court extended its scrutiny to a plaintiff's damages theory, determining that class certification was improper where plaintiff failed to establish that damages could be measured on a classwide basis. . . .

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

This past year, a handful of attorneys secured billions of dollars in settlements and judgments for both classes and individual plaintiffs against massive companies and organizations like Facebook, Dell, the National Association of Realtors, Johnson & Johnson, UFC and Credit Suisse, earning them recognition as Law360's Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar for 2025.