Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Expert Analysis

The Lessons And Limitations Of Chadbourne V. Troice

Law360, New York ( April 14, 2014, 7:24 PM EDT) -- In February, the U. S. Supreme Court decided 7-2 in favor of plaintiffs in an action requiring the interpretation of the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998. Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. Troice (2014). Other than being very good news for the plaintiff investors, and far less so for the defendants — including two large national law firms: Chadbourne & Parke LLP and Proskauer Rose LLP, we attempt here to dig a little deeper to ferret out what more may be learned from Supreme Court Justice Stephen G.  Breyer's opinion and the implications for the future of securities litigation. . . .

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Related Sections

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies