Nearing 30, Is Revlon Showing Its Age?

Law360, New York ( November 14, 2014, 12:04 PM EST) -- Nearly 30 years ago, in Revlon Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings Inc. , the Delaware Supreme Court famously dictated that in certain "sale or change in control" transactions, the fiduciary obligation of a target corporation's board of directors is simply to "get[] the best price for the stockholders. " Much has been written about Revlon in the decades since. But with The Dwindling of Revlon, professors Lyman Johnson and Robert Ricca provide a refreshingly new perspective on the iconic doctrine. Focusing on remedies, the coauthors argue that corporate law has evolved around Revlon, dramatically diminishing the doctrine's importance. . . .

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login