Case Activity (919)

1. Filed: July 28, 2026 | Entered: July 28, 2026 Elena Matyas et al v. Summerkids, Inc. et al

   P.I.: Other | California Central

   Text Only Scheduling Notice

   (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE STATUS REPORTS by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Based on a review of the separately lodged reports from Plaintiff and the Settling Defendants, the parties are directed to meet and confer further on or before August 19, 2026, to seek to resolve any open issues. If all of the open issues are not resolved, any corresponding motion(s) regarding enforcement of the settlement agreement shall be filed by August 24, 2026. Any opposition to any such motion(s) shall be filed by August 31, 2026. No replies are necessary. A hearing on any motion(s) will proceed on September 14, 2026, at 10 a.m., with the precise time to be set when the final calendar for that date is issued. Counsel and parties may appear by Zoom, provided they inform the Courtroom Deputy Clerk of their intention to do so by September 10, 2026. The foregoing schedule is without prejudice to an application or stipulation by any or all relevant parties for an accelerated process based on a showing of good cause based on a claim of ongoing harm. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kelc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY

2. Judgment | Filed: July 27, 2026 | Entered: July 28, 2026 Elena Matyas et al v. Summerkids, Inc. et al

   P.I.: Other | California Central

   Judgment

   JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS THE ENOTECA, LLC; JOSEPH DIMASSA AND MARIA DIMASSA FAMILY TRUST, TRUST DATED APRIL 9, 1981; DIMASSA FAMILY FOUNDATION; ANGELUS MOUNTAIN CENTER; SEMPRE AVANTI, LLC ; MARIA DIMASSA; AND DOSSETT DIMASSA, M.D., AFTER MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt, Related to: Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, 210 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that, for the reasons set forth in the Summary Judgment Order, Plaintiffs claims against Summary Judgment Defendants are DISMISSED in their entirety. JUDGMENT is accordingly hereby entered in favor of Summary Judgment Defendants. Plaintiff shall take nothing by way of his Third Amended Complaint against Summary Judgment Defendants. Pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, there is no just reason for delay, and this shall be deemed a final judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b). (es)

3. 917 additional result(s)