Insurer Beats 4 Philly Cos.' Virus Coverage Class Suits

By Daphne Zhang
Law360 is providing free access to its coronavirus coverage to make sure all members of the legal community have accurate information in this time of uncertainty and change. Use the form below to sign up for any of our weekly newsletters. Signing up for any of our section newsletters will opt you in to the weekly Coronavirus briefing.

Sign up for our Insurance newsletter

You must correct or enter the following before you can sign up:

Select more newsletters to receive for free [+] Show less [-]

Thank You!



Law360 (March 31, 2021, 9:09 PM EDT ) Cincinnati Insurance Co. won its bid to toss four Philadelphia businesses' consolidated class actions seeking COVID-19-related loss coverages, after a Pennsylvania federal judge ruled that the virus and state closure orders did not damage the businesses' properties.

U.S. District Judge Michael M. Baylson closed the cases on Tuesday, holding that the four businesses — a bar, a catering service company, a roller-skating park and a gym — failed to show that they incurred "direct physical loss," a precondition for coverage under their commercial property policies with Cincinnati Insurance.

The businesses, Milkboy Philadelphia, Peachtree Catering and Events, Chester County Sports Arena and Cornerstone Health and Fitness, only demonstrated financial losses but nothing "physical," the judge said. Finding coverage for them would stretch the phrase "direct physical loss" beyond its plain meaning to cover economic losses, he said.

In his decision to shoot down the businesses' suits, Judge Baylson held that a heavily cited Missouri federal case against the same insurer, Studio 417 Inc. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co. , doesn't apply to the Philadelphia businesses' claims.

According to court records, the businesses relied on the Missouri federal court's ruling, which favored a broad definition of "direct physical loss" by finding that the presence of the virus itself provided a basis for coverage. But Judge Baylson said on Tuesday that the case is not persuasive.

"As far as this court is aware, Studio 417 is the only COVID-19 business interruption case where a federal court denied the insurer's motion to dismiss," he said. "The other courts' willingness to find a 'direct physical loss' appears contrary to the plain language of the policies, especially when compared to similar cases in the Third Circuit."

MilkBoy, a bar that also serves as a music venue, filed its proposed class-action suit last April, seeking to represent Cincinnati customers nationwide that had business income, extended business income, extra expense or civil authority insurance policies. Subclasses would cover customers that were either denied claims for losses related to the closure orders or were seeking a declaratory judgment that such claims should be covered.

MilkBoy has argued that Pennsylvania courts have found that a "loss of use," such as an accumulation of gasoline, constitutes a physical loss of access to the property that can trigger coverage, and that the virus causing COVID-19 is no different. Cincinnati asked the court last July to toss the suit, saying the policy only covers physical damage, not a virus transmitted from human to human.

In December, the court consolidated MilkBoy's case with Peachtree Catering's proposed class action, finding that the two businesses' Cincinnati insurance policies contain identical language. On Tuesday, Judge Baylson added Chester County Sports Arena's and Cornerstone Health's cases to his decision in granting summary judgment to Cincinnati in Milkboy and Peachtree's proposed class action, finding that the businesses hold similar policies and present the same legal issue. 

In the order, the judge said the fact that most federal courts have held that COVID-19 losses are not covered under property policies is sufficient for this court to toss the suits and rule that the businesses are not entitled to coverage.

The four businesses have argued that their property suffered a direct physical "loss of use" after being forced to shut down by government mandates. However, Judge Baylson said they showed nothing physical but purely economic losses.

"Government orders in response to a virus simply do not fit this physicality requirement," the judge said.

Representatives for the parties could not be immediately reached for comment. 

The businesses are represented by Daniel E. Bacine, Mark R. Rosen, Jeffrey A. Barrack, Stephen R. Basser and Meghan J. Talbot of Barrack Rodos & Bacine.

Cincinnati Insurance Co. is represented by Lawrence M. Silverman of Litchfield Cavo LLP.

The case is MilkBoy Center City LLC v. The Cincinnati Insurance Co. et al., case number 2:20-cv-02036; Stone Soup Inc. v. The Cincinnati Insurance Co., case number 2:20-cv-02614; Chester County Sports Arena v. The Cincinnati Insurance Co., case number 2:20-cv-02021; Cornerstone Warrington v. The Cincinnati Insurance Co., case number 2:20-cv-02398 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

--Additional reporting by Jeff Sistrunk. Editing by Nicole Bleier.

For a reprint of this article, please contact reprints@law360.com.

Attached Documents

Useful Tools & Links

Related Sections

Case Information

Case Title

CHESTER COUNTY SPORTS ARENA v. THE CINCINNATI SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY


Case Number

2:20-cv-02021

Court

Pennsylvania Eastern

Nature of Suit

Contract: Insurance

Judge

MICHAEL M. BAYLSON

Date Filed

April 24, 2020


Case Title

MILKBOY CENTER CITY LLC v. THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY et al


Case Number

2:20-cv-02036

Court

Pennsylvania Eastern

Nature of Suit

Contract: Insurance

Judge

MICHAEL M. BAYLSON

Date Filed

April 27, 2020


Case Title

CORNERSTONE WARRINGTON, INC. et al v. THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY


Case Number

2:20-cv-02398

Court

Pennsylvania Eastern

Nature of Suit

Contract: Insurance

Judge

MICHAEL M. BAYLSON

Date Filed

May 21, 2020


Case Title

Stone Soup, Inc. v. THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY


Case Number

2:20-cv-02614

Court

Pennsylvania Eastern

Nature of Suit

Contract: Insurance

Judge

MICHAEL M. BAYLSON

Date Filed

June 04, 2020

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Judge Analytics

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!