RPM In IP: RIP To Per Se?

Law360 ( April 9, 2007, 12:00 AM EDT) -- On March 26, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. PSKS Inc., a case which asks the Court to decide whether to overturn its nearly century-old per se condemnation of minimum resale price maintenance (RPM), established in Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park and Sons, 220 U.S. 373 (1911)....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!