What To Consider Before Using Inter Partes Review

Law360, New York ( March 22, 2013, 12:29 PM EDT) -- The America Invents Act created four new post-grant trial-like procedures for challenging patent validity in the United States Patent and Trademark Office. These new patent validity challenge procedures are similar in some respects to district court litigation, but they all have their own substantive and procedural requirements under the AIA and rules adopted by the patent office. On Sept. 16, 2012, two of these procedures, inter partes review (IPR)[1] and covered business method patent review (CBMR)[2], became available to parties charged with or in litigation. Post-grant review (PGR) in general and derivation proceedings, which are intended to replace interferences, will not likely be seen for several years as these procedures only apply to patents granted on applications filed under the new first-inventor-to-file provisions of the AIA, which went into effect March 16, 2013....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!