Macronix Ruling Revives Twombly Questions In Patent Cases

Law360, New York ( March 25, 2014, 1:34 PM EDT) -- One hallmark of 2014 so far has been the proliferation of efforts by Congress and others to stem the tide of baseless patent infringement lawsuits by nonpracticing entities or "patent trolls." Recently, Senior Judge Robert Payne in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia issued a decision in Macronix International Co. Ltd. v. Spansion Inc.,[1] a case involving a practicing entity, in which he laid out in detail how he thinks such reform can be effected without legislation or rule changes....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Related Sections

Law Firms

Government Agencies

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!