2 Assumptions Shape 3rd Circ. Reverse Payment Case

Law360, New York ( November 20, 2014, 12:46 PM EST) -- The U. S. Supreme Court's decision in Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis Inc. [1] subjected patent infringement settlements that include "large and unjustified" payments to antitrust scrutiny for the first time. When it heard oral argument in Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co. Inc. v. SmithKline Beecham Corp. [2] on Wednesday, the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit became the first appellate court to enter the debate regarding the impact of that decision. . . .

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

This past year, a handful of attorneys secured billions of dollars in settlements and judgments for both classes and individual plaintiffs against massive companies and organizations like Facebook, Dell, the National Association of Realtors, Johnson & Johnson, UFC and Credit Suisse, earning them recognition as Law360's Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar for 2025.