Intellectual Property

  • March 30, 2026

    Cardi B, Atlantic Defeat IP Lawsuit Over Hit Single 'Enough'

    A Texas federal judge Monday freed Cardi B from a copyright infringement lawsuit claiming she ripped off two music producers' beats to make her 2024 hit "Enough (Miami)," saying the court lacked personal jurisdiction over the rapper, even if she performed many times in the Lone Star State.

  • March 30, 2026

    Don't Set Special IP Rules For 'Skinny Labels,' Justices Told

    Drugmakers, industry groups, hospitals and scholars have urged the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold a decision letting a patent suit proceed over a generic drug using a so-called skinny label, saying the generics company is seeking unwarranted special protections that would upend patent law.

  • March 30, 2026

    Taylor Swift Stole 'Showgirl' TM From OG Showgirl, Suit Says

    A Las Vegas performer on Monday accused Taylor Swift of infringing her long-held "Confessions of a Showgirl" trademark, claiming in California federal court that Swift's "The Life of a Showgirl" album has caused "textbook reverse confusion" and is threatening to erase the performer "from her very own brand."

  • March 30, 2026

    Georgia Firm Says 'Corporate Mole' Aided Archetype Capital Suit

    An Atlanta-area law firm has accused a Nevada litigation funder of using cloak-and-dagger methods and an "attorney turned corporate mole" to steal the firm's toxic tort trade secrets, only to make a "heel turn" and play the victim by suing the law firm last year.

  • March 30, 2026

    X Corp. Invokes Cox Ruling To Challenge Music Copyright Suit

    X Corp. has argued that a ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court last week that an internet service provider couldn't be held liable for its customers pirating music should allow it to escape copyright infringement claims in Tennessee federal court from a group of music publishers.

  • March 30, 2026

    X Gets Backup In Fed. Circ. Fight Against $175M Patent Loss

    Patent quality advocacy group Askeladden LLC has backed X Corp.'s Federal Circuit challenge to a loss of more than $175 million that it saw in a patent infringement suit, saying the patented claims at issue should have been found invalid to begin with.

  • March 30, 2026

    Justices Told Fed. Circ. Wrongly Axed Car ID Patent Claims

    A vehicle identification system patent owner wants the U.S. Supreme Court to review the Federal Circuit's reversal of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's decision allowing the company to amend claims in two patents challenged by rideshare giant Lyft.

  • March 30, 2026

    Patent Monetization Co. Looks To Sink $32M Arbitration Award

    A patent monetization firm has sued a litigation funder and law firm Susman Godfrey LLP in Texas federal court, seeking to vacate an arbitration award that it says was riddled with errors.

  • March 30, 2026

    Former Intel Engineer Fights Trade Secret Suit

    A former Intel engineer has asked a Washington federal court to dismiss a lawsuit alleging he stole nearly 18,000 files before his employment was terminated in July, saying he wasn't properly notified of the case and responded promptly when he found out about it.

  • March 30, 2026

    Sanofi Claims IP Life Extension Needed For Double Patenting

    The Patent Trial and Appeal Board rightly found a Sanofi patent application shouldn't be rejected for obviousness-type double patenting, as it doesn't improperly extend patent life, the French drugmaker and its allies have told U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Director John Squires.

  • March 30, 2026

    Catching Up With Delaware's Chancery Court

    The Delaware Chancery Court's docket this past week featured disputes involving globally recognized companies, high-dollar contract fights, revived claims from the state's high court and the resolution of a closely watched de-SPAC case.

  • March 30, 2026

    Fastener Co. Can't Slip $17K TM Infringement Judgment

    A Pennsylvania federal judge has upheld a $17,000 trademark infringement judgment against industrial fastener company Peninsula Components after it was found liable for using its competitor Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp's "PEM" name in Google Ads, ruling that the defendant presented no compelling reason to erase the verdict.

  • March 30, 2026

    Tilray Accused Of Dodging $11M In Bob Marley Royalties

    Multistate cannabis giant Tilray owes more than $11 million in royalty payments for using Bob Marley's brand in connection with marijuana products, according to a new lawsuit filed in Delaware Chancery Court.

  • March 30, 2026

    Hunter S. Thompson Whiskey Brand Sued Over IG Photos

    The owner of the copyright to pictures taken by Hunter S. Thompson's personal photographer claimed in Colorado federal court Monday that the whiskey brand owned by Thompson's estate violated copyright law by posting some of the photos on their social media.

  • March 30, 2026

    TriZetto's $70M Trade Secret Verdict Upheld, Total Award Cut

    A New York federal judge has upheld a $70 million compensatory damages verdict for the TriZetto Group in a long-running trade secret fight against Syntel Inc., while also cutting punitive damages to about $140 million and awarding TriZetto more than $12 million in attorney fees.

  • March 30, 2026

    Del. Judge Upholds $34M Verdict In Glaucoma Patent Feud

    A Delaware federal judge has affirmed a $34 million verdict against Alcon and related entities for infringing patents covering medical devices to treat glaucoma, disagreeing that Sight Sciences Inc. had failed to show the accused product meets the limitations of the patent claims.

  • March 30, 2026

    Nationwide Need Not Cover Marker Makers' Trade Secret Fight

    Four Nationwide units have no duty to defend a marker manufacturer in an underlying suit by a competitor alleging it colluded with former employees to use trade secrets and other proprietary information, a Pennsylvania federal judge ruled.

  • March 30, 2026

    J&J Unit Wants Forensic Exam Of Ex-Director's Devices

    A Johnson & Johnson subsidiary urged a New Jersey federal court to order a former associate director to submit to a court-supervised forensic inspection of any device or account in which she could have stored confidential information it claims she downloaded in order to start her own competing company.

  • March 30, 2026

    Retailers Not Covered In Trademark Infringement Dispute

    An insurer has no duty to defend a home goods retailer accused of using another company's trademark in its online advertising and marketing, an Illinois federal court ruled, finding that the underlying suit does not allege a covered personal and advertising injury.

  • March 30, 2026

    High Court Turns Away CRISPR Patent Validity Dispute

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected Agilent Technologies' bid to revive patents on the gene-editing tool CRISPR, which centers on the burden of proof in establishing prior art.

  • March 30, 2026

    Justices Reject TM Appeal Tied To 'Use In Commerce'

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up an appeal challenging a Ninth Circuit ruling that upheld a multimillion-dollar default judgment based largely on statements defendants made in trademark applications.

  • March 27, 2026

    Injunction Constraints Impede Utility Patent Counterfeit Cases

    A Texas federal judge ruled this month that the strongest tool to stop counterfeiters in so-called Schedule A cases doesn't apply to utility patents, which attorneys say cements a long-standing practice of retailers relying on trademarks and design patents.

  • March 27, 2026

    Inventors Back Dolby's Interested-Party High Court Fight

    A group representing inventors and entrepreneurs is supporting Dolby's bid to have the U.S. Supreme Court review a Federal Circuit dismissal of the company's appeal of a Patent Trial and Appeal Board proceeding it won, citing the importance of knowing which parties are behind a patent challenge.

  • March 27, 2026

    Hemp Co. Seeks To Cancel Popular 'Lost Mary' Vape TM

    A North Carolina hemp provider is looking to cancel the popular "Lost Mary" vape trademark, held by the Chinese company that also sells Elf Bars, telling a California federal court that it was always invalid because it's illegal to sell flavored vapes.

  • March 27, 2026

    NCAA's Anti-Sports Betting Stance Becomes An IP Issue

    The National Collegiate Athletic Association has kicked off a legal battle with a trademark infringement lawsuit against DraftKings for using terms like "March Madness" to describe the basketball competition, bringing the issue of sports betting to court and signaling a more active role in intellectual property enforcement.

Expert Analysis

  • Series

    Trail Running Makes Me A Better Lawyer

    Author Photo

    Navigating the muddy, root-filled path of trail marathons and ultramarathons provides fertile training ground for my high-stakes fractional general counsel work, teaching me to slow down my mind when the terrain shifts, sharpen my focus and trust my training, says Eric Proos at Next Era Legal.

  • Trade Secret Steps To Take As Exposure Risk Increases

    Author Photo

    Against the backdrop of rising trade secret litigation, greater employee mobility and constraints on noncompetes, recent cases highlight the importance of minimizing trade secret risks when employees leave or when new hires join, say attorneys at Sullivan & Cromwell.

  • Open Questions After Defense Contractor Executive Order

    Author Photo

    The scope and long-term effects of President Donald Trump’s executive order on the U.S. defense industrial base are uncertain, but the immediate impact is significant as it appears to direct the U.S. Department of Defense to take a more active role in contractor affairs, say attorneys at Morgan Lewis.

  • What Artists Can Learn From Latest AI Music Licensing Deals

    Author Photo

    Recent partnerships between music labels and artificial intelligence companies raise a number of key questions for artists, rightsholders and other industry players about IP, revenue-sharing, and rights and obligations, say attorneys at Manatt.

  • If Your AI Vendor Goes Bankrupt: Keeping Licensed IP Access

    Author Photo

    With contracting norms still evolving to account for the licensing of artificial intelligence tools, customers that need to retain access to key AI products in the event of vendor’s bankruptcy should consider four elements that could determine whether they may invoke traditional Section 365(n) intellectual property protections, say attorneys at Sidley.

  • USPTO's New Patentability Focus Helps Emerging Tech

    Author Photo

    The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's recent efforts to shift patentability criteria back toward traditional standards of novelty, obviousness and adequate disclosure should make it easier for emerging tech, including artificial intelligence, to obtain patents, says Bill Braunlin at Barclay Damon.

  • Malpractice Claim Assignability Continues To Divide Courts

    Author Photo

    Recent decisions from courts across the country demonstrate how different jurisdictions balance competing policy interests in determining whether legal malpractice claims can be assigned, providing a framework to identify when and how to challenge any attempted assignment, says Christopher Blazejewski at Sherin & Lodgen.

  • Tips For Financial Advisers Facing TRO From Former Firm

    Author Photo

    The Eighth Circuit's recent decision in Choreo v. Lors, overturning a lower court's sweeping injunction after financial advisers moved to a new firm, gives advisers new strategies to fight restraining orders from their old firms, such as focusing on whether the alleged irreparable harm is calculable, say attorneys at Kutak Rock.

  • Learning From A Typical Section 1782 Discovery Case

    Author Photo

    A California federal judge's recent approval of a Section 1782 application, compelling a U.S.-based company to produce materials relevant to a German patent dispute, usefully illustrates the specific steps foreign litigants must undertake before wielding this powerful tool for obtaining evidence unavailable via discovery mechanisms abroad, say attorneys at Fish & Richardson.

  • How To Trademark A Guy In 8 Ways: An IP Strategy Against AI

    Author Photo

    Attempting a novel method of protection against artificial intelligence misuse of his voice and likeness, Matthew McConaughey's recent efforts to register eight trademarks for a series of audio and video clips of himself underscore the importance of extending existing legal frameworks beyond traditional applications, says Summer Todd at Patterson Intellectual Property.

  • Utilizing The ITC To Combat 'Gray Market' IP Infringement

    Author Photo

    As technological developments intensify trademark owners' need to respond swiftly to "gray market" sales of international goods imported into the U.S. without the trademark owner's consent, litigating at the U.S. International Trade Commission offers an underutilized enforcement option, say attorneys at MoFo.

  • Series

    Teaching Logic Makes Me A Better Lawyer

    Author Photo

    Teaching middle and high school students the skills to untangle complicated arguments and identify faulty reasoning has made me reacquaint myself with the defined structure of thought, reminding me why logic should remain foundational in the practice of law, says Tom Barrow at Woods Rogers.

  • From IPR To EPR: The Rapid Rise Of Ex Parte Reexamination

    Author Photo

    With the current administration's dramatic shifts in policy rendering inter partes reviews essentially unavailable for the majority of patents being asserted in litigation, IPR filing rates have plunged, and ex parte reexamination requests have surged to the average rate of IPR petitions in 2024, say attorneys at McKool Smith.

  • Series

    Law School's Missed Lessons: Practicing Resilience

    Author Photo

    Resilience is a skill acquired through daily practices that focus on learning from missteps, recovering quickly without internalizing defeat and moving forward with intention, says Nicholas Meza at Quarles & Brady.

  • Upshot Of 'Skinny Label' Case May Go Beyond Pharma

    Author Photo

    The U.S. Supreme Court's pending review of Hikma v. Amarin, over a drugmaker's "skinny label," carries implications for both generics and brand-name pharmaceutical manufacturers, and could shed light on how inducement doctrine should operate in other regulated industries where products have substantial lawful uses, says Jason Shull at Banner Witcoff.

Want to publish in Law360?


Submit an idea

Have a news tip?


Contact us here
Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Intellectual Property archive.