The NJ High Court Case That Could Recast NJ Insurance Law

Law360, New York ( May 22, 2015, 10:23 AM EDT) -- On May 7, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion with the potential to materially transform insurance litigation in that state. For many years, New Jersey Rule of Civil Practice 4:42-9(a)(6) has permitted state court judges to award counsel fees to any "successful claimant" in an action brought "under a liability or indemnity policy of insurance." In Occhifinto v. Olivo Construction Company,[1] however, New Jersey's highest court broadly defined the definition of "successful claimant" and seemingly gave short-shrift to the discretionary component of this rule. Moreover, an argument can be made that Occhifinto moves New Jersey down the path towards becoming a "direct action" state. Still further, for reasons discussed below, Occhifinto is likely to impact domestic insurers in New Jersey more negatively than it will affect nonresident liability carriers...

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Related Sections

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!