No Preemption Split To Resolve In Reglan Case, Justices Told

By Jeannie O'Sullivan ( March 3, 2017, 9:17 PM EST) -- The consumers who alleged that Pliva Inc. and other drugmakers didn't adequately warn about the neurological risks of generic Reglan have urged the U.S. Supreme Court to reject the companies' petition for certiorari, arguing that no court split exists on whether the state law claims are preempted by federal law....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!