Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
PTAB Cases (109)
-
Filed: February 27, 2024 |
IPR2024-00558
Microchip Technology, Inc. Inter Partes Review
...., Petitioner, v. APTIV TECHNOLOGIES AG AND APTIV TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, Patent Owners. Case No. IPR2024-00558 U.S....Praxair, Inc. v. ATMI, Inc., 543 F.3d 1306, 1319 (Fed. Cir. 2008). That the district court did not “further constru[e]” (EX1080, 16) the “having” limitation is irrelevant because the non-indefiniteness contingency was met (Pet., 26-30). The Majority correctly observed that, beyond the indefiniteness issue, “[n]either party proposed a construction in the district court litigation.”...Intel Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc., 21 F.4th 801, 812-14 (Fed. Cir. 2021). The Intel logic applies with even more force here, where the claim was found not indefinite.%>...
- Filed: February 27, 2024 | IPR2024-00496 Microchip Technology, Inc. Inter Partes Review
- 107 additional result(s)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- Full-text search of patent complaints
- Full-text search of PTAB cases and documents
- Database of TTAB cases and documents, including full-text search of documents
- Customized email alerts and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login